Captain Halliday
Established Member
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2014
- Posts
- 4,686
Welcome to AFF - took a while for your first postAs someone catching an Embraer from MEL to TSV and back this week... yay? :|
Just because they’re descending rapidly doesn’t necessarily equate to depressurisation. As a general rule, I’d look for a level off at 10,000’ for a depressurisation. And, I certainly don’t see much reason to be tootling along at 7,000’, down amongst the light aircraft brigade.Some sort of issue on QF1871 TSV-BNE
The descent indicates it could be pressurisation.
True. Hence "could be".Just because they’re descending rapidly doesn’t necessarily equate to depressurisation.
What operational reasons might there be for going to 7,000' for a pressurisation issue?I certainly don’t see much reason to be tootling along at 7,000’, down amongst the light aircraft brigade.
The quotation marks are probably appropriate. Most of the spokespeople struggle to understand that the company operates aircraft.But in this case it was, as confirmed by "a Qantas spokeswoman".
None really. They had a huge rate of descent, and I think they simply overshot the level off.What operational reasons might there be for going to 7,000' for a pressurisation issue?
Thanks! Yeah I definitely lurked for a while. Time to be more active!Welcome to AFF - took a while for your first post
and very scrappy holding pattern; kids today, so messy.Storms causing some fun in BNE again this evening. VA782's just gone around.
Of course, the go-around could be for totally different reasons.
View attachment 412035
It's not a holding pattern, per se. The fact that it doesn't hold over one position, but drifts downwind tells you that it's being done manually, by simply dragging the heading controller around. An FMC controlled pattern will always anchor to one spot. You can't actually program an orbit (holding) into the FMC...but you could do one with a .1 min leg...so 6 seconds is the shortest time the FMCs will accept. It was never really useful, because if ATC wanted an orbit, that's what they asked for. But, it made for a good (albeit useless) quiz question.I don’t think I’ve experienced such circular holding patterns like that.
Nice. Neat. (And if you can't be neat laterally, due moving storms, be neat vertically)There’s four in the pattern above OOL.
19,000
20,000
21,000 and
22,000 feet respectively.
View attachment 413453
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
The recent flight history for that aircraft is crazy…Link trainee pilots getting their hours?Just had something go over out place REALLY low.
I went out side and it made a second pass.
My reaction “wow #%¥#… that thing is below 200 feet.”
FR24 showing it between 175ft and as slow as 50feet at times.
I’m not buying 0 feet on the second pass:
View attachment 413879
The low passes over RWY19L and 19R makes me think it was some sort of calibration flight.The recent flight history for that aircraft is crazy…Link trainee pilots getting their hours?