- Joined
- Oct 13, 2013
- Posts
- 15,548
Totally understand but practically cash is better because generally speaking cash of the same value as cute clothing plus delivery goes much further in Africa than cute clothing.cash is sort of not what I wanted to do. I don’t know the girl particularly well and I just wanted to send some cute little clothes for her baby.... Botswana is a fabulous country and very honest - just totally forgot the parcel had to go via Joburg. I’ve been lucky - sent dozens of parcels to South Africa and never had one go astray - just taken 6 or 7 months!
I’m speculating that air freight originating in Australia to Africa goes via Qantas usually. That means JNB (if originated in PER maybe even with SA but will still be JNB). Then if sent via FedEx it would most likely still go on QF63. I remember when I ordered some tyres from the UK to AU via FedEx. It was sent on QF2. Air freight is usually a hub and spoke operation. In this case hub would be JNB
Many years ago our school decided to support Hamlin Fistula Clinic in Africa. The group responsible decided to send clothing and other supplies to the patients there. They found out quickly that the logistics was going to be expensive and the goods may be taken by others along the route. Cash (electronic) was king and what was cute and nice for us here may not be the same there and cash allows the purchase of important items from the local economy which then has an economic multiplier effect.
Sending donated medicines to places like that is also logistically very difficult. Refrigeration, sorting, storage and continuity of supply are important considerations. So hospitals here never send excess medications overseas.
Here are some links on what cash is better than “in kind” donations:
https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefw...-on-food-consumption-may-2013-final-clean.pdf
http://www.tcd.ie/Economics/assets/pdf/TCD_Econ_Seminar_Cash_and_Food_Aid_April_2011.pdf
Last edited: