Unnecessarily complicated loyalty program rules & features

Joined
Aug 21, 2011
Posts
15,929
Qantas
Platinum
Virgin
Platinum
SkyTeam
Elite Plus
Star Alliance
Gold
What's the most pointlessly complicated or poorly explained rule/feature of a loyalty program that you've come across?
 
What's the most pointlessly complicated or poorly explained rule/feature of a loyalty program that you've come across?

The Accor eco-system of 'paid cards' (how they relate to each other etc). Every time I try to understand it by reading the threads here, I end up with my head buried underneath a pillow.
 
What's the most pointlessly complicated or poorly explained rule/feature of a loyalty program that you've come across?
You're still annoyed about the intercon suite upgrade aren't you...

But in all seriousness, the general PQP/PQS/PQD and similar rules of US programs are a general pet peeve.
 
Pointlessly complicated feature: Qantas’ IT which makes it impossible to easily book moderately complex award bookings or change even some of the most simple award bookings online.

Pointlessly complicated rule(s): Overly complex lounge entry arrangements (VA and SkyTeam airlines being the main culprits).
 
I still haven’t got my head around the various Star Alliance programs. I would estimate that out of my flights the ones that I have to chase up the most for points are Star Alliance. I’m not sure why they make it so hard to earn points across their alliance and a couple of times I’ve just given up in the end.
 
Not all QF status credits are credited equal. Some contribute to lifetime and/or P1, but only if it’s not from a credit card/it’s called Loyalty Bonus/divisible by a prime number/comes doused with Neil’s vinaigrette. The T&Cs and list of ^*#%+ are long.

VA’s rolling status credit earn also confuses me in how much I have to earn when.
 
VA’s rolling status credit earn also confuses me in how much I have to earn when.
This! VA Confuses me so much ... I'm very used to the QF way of membership year I guess.
That's one thing I do not find confusing. Qualification is based on the prior 365 days of travel, Re-Qualification for subsequent years is based on each years travel since the date of initial qualification.
 
✅ Compare prices instantly in one place, in real-time
✅ Add Zyft to your browser or use the App on any mobile device
✅ Scan a barcode in the app for instant price comparison

Be clever, shop better – with Zyft.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

That's one thing I do not find confusing. Qualification is based on the prior 365 days of travel, Re-Qualification for subsequent years is based on each years travel since the date of initial qualification.

I find it confusing. Can you make a diagram? 🤣
 
I remember trying to make a redemption for my family using Asiana points on Air NZ some years ago. Before allowing me to redeem points for my wife and children, Asiana made me fill out and send a paper form for each family member, along with copies of my family members' passports. Then I had to make the redemption itself over the phone. I remember reflecting that the rigmarole involved in making the redemption took longer than the flight itself...
 
That's one thing I do not find confusing. Qualification is based on the prior 365 days of travel, Re-Qualification for subsequent years is based on each years travel since the date of initial qualification.
I agree that in hindsight, once you’ve reached qualification, it’s not really confusing. For me it was having reached platinum for instance for the first time,( inoneleap) the time frames changed and that was something to get my head around.
 
That's one thing I do not find confusing. Qualification is based on the prior 365 days of travel, Re-Qualification for subsequent years is based on each years travel since the date of initial qualification.
IIRC that is how QFF used to operate prior to the introduction of SC's.TC's in 1998, which is when the current system of going by years starting from the relevant calendar month was introduced. IMHO either is greatly preferable to going by calendar years which many airlines apparently still do.
 
IIRC that is how QFF used to operate prior to the introduction of SC's.TC's in 1998, which is when the current system of going by years starting from the relevant calendar month was introduced. IMHO either is greatly preferable to going by calendar years which many airlines apparently still do.
I joined in late 1994 and the Qantas "Year" philosophy was as it is now. Back then it was somewhat simpler for status earn: 20 eligible flights (in any class) would get Blue Status, 50 Silver and 80 Gold. (There was an alternate distance criteria). Gold had the holy grail of Lounge access.

The rot began to set in with the introduction of booking class based Tier Credits in September 1998.
 
That's one thing I do not find confusing. Qualification is based on the prior 365 days of travel, Re-Qualification for subsequent years is based on each years travel since the date of initial qualification.
On of the creators of the Velocity system once told me that he probably wouldn't go down the rolling totals path if he started again. Basically said that worked out to be too difficult to explain to many members how it worked.
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top