AIRwin
Enthusiast
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2013
- Posts
- 11,545
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Virgin
- Gold
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
For customers it gives the impression of a larger airline and confidence in a brand especially European/American based customers.
Surely the Virgin Brand has some value to it especially when you come to sell the airline at a later date.
I think the royalties income stream might also have a part to play. It’s also not clear whether even Bain needs the extra capital investment or is it instead of a royalties stream.And atm where Bain is only offering 5% and Sir rich is wanting 10%. who know if sir rich does not get his way the airline will no doubt change the name.
Some value, but offset by whatever annual fee Branson wants (and historically it was a %ge revenue, not profit).
Also the risk of having your brand attached to an individual in this current era.
Most of the PR stunts were at the behest of the Australian CEO/MD at the time (Godfrey/Borghetti) and generally related to launching a route.Should make it a % of profit this time around might make him focus more on the actual sustainability of VA2 rather than flashy PR stunts that do sweet nothing
Should make it a % of profit this time around might make him focus more on the actual sustainability of VA2 rather than flashy PR stunts that do sweet nothing
‘“Re-imagined” business class meals’... looks like they are starting from a low base then!
Try this
Virgin slammed for serving two-minute noodles in business class
Embattled airline Virgin Australia is running so low on supplies it's been serving two-minute noodles to business class passengers.www.dailymail.co.uk
Surely wouldn't meet the standards of being a full member of a Global Alliance, let alone afford the cost of joining one (or having the members approve the application).
Otherwise the "Value Alliance" might be of their level with the J-class LCC standards usually met on the medium/long-haul arms of those LCCs.