anat0l
Enthusiast
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2006
- Posts
- 11,669
I agree completely that requirements can be used as excuses (or "reasons") for almost anything in life where there is a potential to misuse authority and power. In this case Mr 1A repeatedly refused to comply with lawful instructions issued by the crew, including the captain. He was lucky that he was not arrested and did not have charges pressed against him, something that is more likely to occur today. Having seen the whole performance from a distance of a few inches I am certain that it was the correct decision.
He was offloaded, though? What happened after that would be anyone's guess, unless you followed it up, or it made the news. He might have been charged (that procedure doesn't have to happen on the aircraft whilst he is being seized), though my money would have been that he would have probably been given just a stern warning not to do it again, and put on the next flight at no additional expense (except on his pride / reputation, plus any time lost / hotels etc. that he'd either eat or try and bum off the insurance company but not the airline).