lovetravellingoz
Enthusiast
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2006
- Posts
- 12,704
Great post, but say a vaccine is available in 12 to 18 months after rigorous testing and endorsement by Therapeutic Goods Administration in Oz and similar regulators overseas, wouldn't it mean if we were vaccinated that whether residents of 'poorer' countries weren't wouldn't really matter to us?
I would note:
- The sheer volume of people to be vaccinated will mean that it takes a while
- The vaccine is not likely be 100% effective. ie It is not for flu vaccines
- That even with the vaccine that the mortality rate may still remain higher than for the flu as it more aggressive in what it does. And it is not just the mortality rate as about 15-20% evidently suffer long-terms lung damage.
With respect to poorer countries:
Widespread ripping through their communities is likely to leave them in a parlous state. You may wish to visit, they may want the $$, but the capability to actually be a tourist in such countries would be doubtful. Emotionally I doubt that I would be up to it and I am a traveller that has in the main visited third world destinations.