Who is going to the Qantas AGM in 2023?

Chaps like us have to support other chaps like us. I would bet that the directors of major institutions are members of the same clubs etc as those of Qantas. A sacrificial lamb may be offered up - with a big pay-out - but business will continue as normal.
They have already gotten rid of the "you know who".
===
Any way for a random to walk in and watch this? Happens that I’m right there in the area that day with a free hour or two and figure it’s going to be entertaining.
After what happened to AJ in Perth, it likely that now adays, they will want to vet attendees.
Probably need proof of id too.
 
Didn't know who Mr Mayne is but have heard of Crikey website.
Activist shareholder, says AFR.
Maybe he (Mr Mayne) feels its his right as shareholder to cause ruckus, and heckle or speak up at AGMs.
Most shareholders go for the free grub, but these days, they don't give out a lot of food anymore, so maybe we need someone like Mr Mayne argueing his case.
Going to hide in my dogbox under my doona now.
 
Didn't know who Mr Mayne is but have heard of Crikey website.
Activist shareholder, says AFR.
Maybe he (Mr Mayne) feels its his right as shareholder to cause ruckus, and heckle or speak up at AGMs.
Most shareholders go for the free grub, but these days, they don't give out a lot of food anymore, so maybe we need someone like Mr Mayne argueing his case.
Going to hide in my dogbox under my doona now.
I've only know him from his podcast with Alan Kohler and it does seem he's always sticking up for the mum and dad shareholders and asking pertinent questions
 
Off Topic: if I don't want to have my few QF shares bought off from me, ie, their 2023 buyback, does any one know if they can do that this time round?
The last time, they put the shares as "compulsory acquisition", which would have been a few years back now.
On Topic.
 
Thanks Oz_mark.
===
*Its Unmarketable parcel sharebuy back*.
Its called, ok, so for once this is not the case with the 2023 Qantas share buyback.
 
Todd Samson, who is the on the QF board, is the youngest one there.
All the others are older.
Not that its very/so important, but maybe that is why a lot of the decisions are not suitable/not considered suitable.
Not a representative age range of the Aust travelling population.
Maybe they should have a more representative of the younger generation.
===
Any questions to the board:
Why does your board not have people of the younger generation.
53 vs 69/70...
 
EXCLUSIVE OFFER - Offer expires: 20 Jan 2025

- Earn up to 200,000 bonus Velocity Points*
- Enjoy unlimited complimentary access to Priority Pass lounges worldwide
- Earn up to 3 Citi reward Points per dollar uncapped

*Terms And Conditions Apply

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Todd Samson, who is the on the QF board, is the youngest one there.
All the others are older.
Not that its very/so important, but maybe that is why a lot of the decisions are not suitable/not considered suitable.
Not a representative age range of the Aust travelling population.
Probably is representative of the punters that make them all their money & who subsidise the Aust travelling population … ie. those who pay for J & F.
Premium fares pay for the ability to carry all that squished-in cattle around.
 
Todd Samson, who is the on the QF board, is the youngest one there.
All the others are older.
Not that its very/so important, but maybe that is why a lot of the decisions are not suitable/not considered suitable.
Not a representative age range of the Aust travelling population.
Maybe they should have a more representative of the younger generation.
===
Any questions to the board:
Why does your board not have people of the younger generation.
53 vs 69/70...
Oh, Poochie
 
All the talk has been about the flyers bringing the revenue but how big is the actual contribution of commercial passenger income compared to the total revenue? Given that the FF program might bring a considerable amount and QF also carries freight, how significant are the flying public to the income, after all?
 
how big is the actual contribution of commercial passenger income compared to the total revenue
I'm not sure this forum would like the answer. Given loyalty is their most profitable division, I'd say it's the punters who spend way too much acquiring points and burn them on toasters.
 
I'm not sure this forum would like the answer. Given loyalty is their most profitable division, I'd say it's the punters who spend way too much acquiring points and burn them on toasters.
Is “profitable” in total turnover, or per-minion?
’Cos they prolly have 12 minions running the whole points-scheme thingy, but I could see a handful of flights being Surprise! massively huge money-earners if they just happened to have tail-winds and need 5-digits-dollars less fuel than expected.
 
Last edited:
’Cos they prolly have 12 minions running the whole points-scheme thingy, but I could see a handful of flights being Surprise! massively huge money-earners if they just happened to have tail-winds and need 5-digits-dollars less fuel than expected.
True, but that may be only to be undone by the next flight where they get late clearance to take off and bust a ton of connections and have to put a bunch of people up in hotels overnight and shuffle deck chairs for the next day.

If you could win every time, that would be one very profitable airline.
 
I'm not sure this forum would like the answer. Given loyalty is their most profitable division, I'd say it's the punters who spend way too much acquiring points and burn them on toasters.
That's where my headspace was, as well. The commercial passenger ticket revenue might be a small(er) part of the total group revenue and especially profit. While there's been a lot of noise in public about the punters and their flight credits, lost luggage, etc, how important is that financially to the Qantas Group? Sure, it's embarrassing, poor business and image, and some of their actions been more or less illegal, but there must be plenty of calculated risk in the mix. Whether it's risk management gone wrong is perhaps one of the questions for the shareholders and possibly even to be raised at the AGM or the Board.
 
Qantas Board member and brand expert Todd Sampson is up for re-election this year. Facing some opposition


Proxy adviser Ownership Matters says Qantas shareholders should vote against the re-election of Todd Sampson to the airline’s board, and hold him accountable for brand and reputation issues.
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top