Changing the topic slightly, and to play devil's advocate, I do wonder if the (assumably Bain-mandated) changes could be intended to accommodate not only the pending QR alliance (currently at the ACCC) but also to "exit" most of their primary "International Long Haul Passengers" (who rarely flies VAd) from the VFF books.
Thus the changes are leant towards accommodating their "core passengers" the VA domestic network, as a primary "domestic carrier", whilst focusing their (Long Haul) international primarily on QR going west, followed by SQ in Asia and UA going east going forward.
As some have said in the past across multiple forums including here, VA should "exit (long haul) International," but they didn't expect changes like this to remove most of their Long Haul (international) codeshare (or even non-codeshare Long Haul International/VFF members) passengers from VA. Changing focus on their Domestic network with supplemental income from VARA and their Short Haul International Leisure network, and focusing most of their long haul international codeshare network on three primary carriers (QR, SQ and UA)
Thus the changes are leant towards accommodating their "core passengers" the VA domestic network, as a primary "domestic carrier", whilst focusing their (Long Haul) international primarily on QR going west, followed by SQ in Asia and UA going east going forward.
As some have said in the past across multiple forums including here, VA should "exit (long haul) International," but they didn't expect changes like this to remove most of their Long Haul (international) codeshare (or even non-codeshare Long Haul International/VFF members) passengers from VA. Changing focus on their Domestic network with supplemental income from VARA and their Short Haul International Leisure network, and focusing most of their long haul international codeshare network on three primary carriers (QR, SQ and UA)