Strangely, I don't remember being asked my preference or take at any stage on this. Did any other AFF members do a survey that hinted at this possibly taking place?
Woolworths claims its research suggests only 9 per cent of customers were chasing frequent flyer points when they shopped at Woolies compared to 68 per cent, who wanted cheaper groceries.
Less than half of Woolworths 9 million card holders are linked through to the Qantas Frequent Flyer program
I would expect that the current discounts offered on the orange "EDR discount" special tickets are the sorts of earn you'll get to WWD. I see the auto $10 save with no chance of saving up past $10 or picking when to use them will be a big issue and lead to many complaints at the checkouts.Apparently how it will work is that selected items marked with orange labels will earn a certain amount of "Woolworths Dollars". These dollars can then be put towards savings at the checkout in blocks of $10, and you can store up to $50 worth of Woolworths Dollars on your account at any one time. The example the rep gave is that a $10 product might earn $1.30 in "Woolworths Dollars", but apparently that is merely an example - not an actual earn rate.
Because the items earning WWD aren't always the same. They will change week to week.If they really wanted to offer savings, why not just make the hypothetical $10 item $8.70 in the first place and ditch the whole scheme?
I would expect that the current discounts offered on the orange "EDR discount" special tickets are the sorts of earn you'll get to WWD. I see the auto $10 save with no chance of saving up past $10 or picking when to use them will be a big issue and lead to many complaints at the checkouts.
(Where did you get this "Store up to $50" thing from? There is no mention of that in any document I've seen in WOW Store Portal or StoreNet)
@_@ Sounds like they are telling the store teams something different to what they tell the call center.The Woolworths rep I spoke to on the phone said that Woolworths Dollars would be redeemable in blocks of $10, and there would be an option once $10 was reached to either redeem the dollars or accumulate and store them on the card, up to a value of $50.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Interesting numbers..
You should hear how much some suppliers pay Woolworths for product placement etc.With one strike of the pen thru the QFF agreement Woolies has gone from funding $80M a year to zilch ... bet those orange tickets are linked to supplier funded discounts. Smart!
Lies, damned lies and statistics
I wonder what the proportional spend of the 9% points chasers was
With one strike of the pen thru the QFF agreement Woolies has gone from funding $80M a year to zilch ... bet those orange tickets are linked to supplier funded discounts. Smart!
lol.Interesting numbers..
You mean the rule that says 80% of sales are from the normal shelve location. only 20% are from off located displays?80/20 rule
You should hear how much some suppliers pay Woolworths for product placement etc.
Pipsi and Coke are often paying millions to get displays and prime ends for their stock. Twinings paid on the order of $80 million to get an entire bay of a new tea flavor in 400 stores about a year ago...
With all this talk of ditching WoW (for greener pastures) and assuming most here purchase 5% off wish gift cards via cash rewards or motor clubs (expert level tight-coughs), can a similar 5% discount also be found for Coles and Myer gift cards?
If not the weekly shop just got a whole lot more expensive...
Seems like sound logic for 4:25amI call BS.... but here's my thinking:
1) If shoppers prefer discounts over QFF points why was there even a tie-up in the first place (didn't woolworths do their homework before entering into a $100m+ deal?)
2) When you ask people point blank what they want in a product, 99% of the population can't accurately articulate and analyse their own thought process. If Apple had asked people what they want in a phone back in 2005, the answer would be 'more memory, more menu options'. It takes a visionary to read between the lines and you can't get this from asking straight up questions like Woolworths is implying, which means they didn't do their homework.
3) Assuming homework has been completed - Woolworths new program would need to have a lower cost base than the QFF alternate, which means there will be less rewarding compared to what QFF points would have cost (factoring in breakage etc..) This means it will be less rewarding for consumers.
4) The beauty of QFF points was that it's an aspirational, subjective reward. Those 25,000 points could mean a $200 voucher or a $2000 flight upgrade depending how you viewed it. The new Woolies program is nothing more than a discount program. No aspirations, no subjective value. No gamification and therefore no long term loyalty/stickiness.
5) Why call it Woolworths Dollars? I'll get over the unimaginative name for a second which any primary school kid could dream up. Using the word dollars instantly locks down the value and creates no room to grow the program into anything more later on. People will link $1 AUD to $1 WWD and means devaluing the currency at any point in the future will make the conversion difficult for many.
6) There will be a portion% of people who don't shop at Woolworths any longer and another % that will change spending patterns to be under $30 (thus messing with average basket size and a bunch of other metrics)
7) The move may attract more low value customers to the brand who are seeking discounts rather than points (Aldi strategy?)
8) Keeping a QFF option to satisfy that market segment seems logical. Terminating entirely suggests some type of commercial conflict or some new thinking none of us can fathom
9) Not delaying the changes after the Flybuys/Etihad deal to re-evaluate..? Or was it? Hard to tell.
10) I doubt we'll see any major (20%+) shift in numbers, but if we did - this would directly affect product placement revenue for Woolies.
11) With more affluent customers who fly and driven by miles shifting to Coles - this adds value to flybuys program, thus hurting other Woolies owned businesses in the process.
12) Potentially now shines more light on Etihad... double loss to QF.
..Lots more... too tired to list it all out.
So either Woolworths has totally failed to have understanding of the loyalty business (which will cost them big bucks, market share, wasted resources, overhead of running the program, additional manpower for customer service etc..) - or the statement about customers wanting this all lies.
AND/OR
QFF didn't bring out the big guns to prove how moving away from QFF as an inducement/data partnerships/knowledge sharing would ultimately cost woolworths even more. Fortunately there is available data for QFF to gauge the impact and re-engage WOW.
AND/OR
QFF wanted better terms, higher point cost or some type of commercial conflict
Either way it's a mess. I don't see much positive coming from this change in the near future.