anat0l
Enthusiast
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2006
- Posts
- 11,669
I've been to all but 3 of the top 10; those three are: AMS Schipol, YVR and NGO Central Japan.
The wrestle for top spot is a tough one - I probably couldn't split hairs between ICN and HKG.
No I don't believe SIN deserves the #1 spot.
I'm a bit surprised to see MUC there. MUC is as office looking as FRA is, except it has less traffic going through it. But still has the same signage idiosyncrasies that seem to give FRA a bad name.
The article in the OP gives the ranking of Sydney at 20 and Melbourne at 43. Suffice to say Brisbane doesn't "rate", for reasons unknown...
There is a hasty article correction which states:
Not sure if that is in order or just states the five which are there. Surprised to see OOL there! I'd probably sooner see ADL there.
The wrestle for top spot is a tough one - I probably couldn't split hairs between ICN and HKG.
No I don't believe SIN deserves the #1 spot.
I'm a bit surprised to see MUC there. MUC is as office looking as FRA is, except it has less traffic going through it. But still has the same signage idiosyncrasies that seem to give FRA a bad name.
So the big question is where do any of Australian airports rate?? So neglected in decent quality infrastructure stakes..
The article in the OP gives the ranking of Sydney at 20 and Melbourne at 43. Suffice to say Brisbane doesn't "rate", for reasons unknown...
There is a hasty article correction which states:
The top five airports overall for Australia/Pacific were Auckland, Sydney, Brisbane, Melbourne and the Gold Coast.
Not sure if that is in order or just states the five which are there. Surprised to see OOL there! I'd probably sooner see ADL there.