2024 F1 Thread

Sponsored Post

Struggling to use your Frequent Flyer Points?

Frequent Flyer Concierge takes the hard work out of finding award availability and redeeming your frequent flyer or credit card points for flights.

Using their expert knowledge and specialised tools, the Frequent Flyer Concierge team at Frequent Flyer Concierge will help you book a great trip that maximises the value for your points.

 
Reports this morning have stated that Perez to remain at RBR and RIC to stay at VRB for the rest of 2024. RIC will be searching for a seat in 2025.
 
Wonder if Alpine will now pull the trigger on their second seat, with Carlos confirming to Williams.
Hoping for Doohan....
 

That article pretty much points out all the details with the extenuating circumstances that this is Spa, resurfaced, and there is no warm-down lap to pick up debris, and the race was clean with no VSC or real safety car so higher fuel consumption so everyone who was short fueled (which is pretty much all the cars) had fuel preservation issues, so I expect that if all of the cars had been weighed there would have been a lot of underweight cars and anyone else who did a 1-stop also would have been underweight.

The rules do seem a bit silly, and I can see why they were implemented (to stop teams putting blocks of ice in cars and having the ice melt) but in this case the rules have created a perverse outcome where the driver and team that took the risk of going 1 stop were penalized for their strategic success. It could have easily been the case that Russell's old hard tyres "fell off a cliff" performance-wise or even failed with 5 laps to go, and that is the risk side of the risk/reward choice for the 1 stop strategy, competitors would not have complained about that outcome, that's the risk that Russel and Mercedes took.

Pirelli would have been instructed to bring a hard tyre that was "hard enough" to make a 1-stop a possible strategic choice, whats the point of telling Pirelli that when 1-stoppers at Spa were going to be punished for using all the rubber on their set of tyres? May as well have mandated that everyone do a 2-stop race! And no one would support that argument.

The resurfacing of Spa and the unknown tyre wear because of the changeable weather from Quali to the race undoubtedly affected all drivers and teams, and its interesting that during the race Piastri diagnosed the secret of winning that Spa race as being in "clean air" or perhaps more accurately - being in clear air on the right tyres at the right time and his realization in the cool-down room that an even faster way around Spa that day was doing a 1 stop as Russell did, because the track rubbered in and developed over the race. Hamilton also made the point that everyone who was pitting during the race was often leaving a lot of rubber and tyre life behind In the pit stop garage.

Unlike other technical breaches, its interesting that other teams are pretty quiet about this and I think that's an admission that they recognize that Russsel maximized his tyre life and his strategy guys rolled the dice and they deserved the win. I think this whole fetish about car weights is a technological and competitive dead end brought about by not having refueling during the race and the reintroduction of refuelling would be worth a look as it would produce more variables in strategy and racing that would lead to more interesting races.

The crowds want to see motor car racing, not tyre preservation parades, and not weight management and fuel economy Sunday poker runs. They want to see teams maximize their performance and drivers use skill and judgment to maximize tyre life, track position and adjust to changing track conditions to be at the front when the chequered flag falls.

/end rant (And I'm not even a Mercedes or Russell fan)
 
Last edited:
/end rant (And I'm not even a Mercedes or Russel fan)
The thing is, a line is drawn with the rules - teams are aware of these rules and I'm sure will take them to the limit.

Once of the earlier para's of that article is interesting:

“The car was not fully drained according to the draining procedure submitted by the team in their legality documents as TR Article 6.5.2 is fulfilled."

Does this mean the team deliberately did not drain the tanks as much as they should have? That sentence suggests they are supposed to but didn't.
 
and there is no warm-down lap to pick up debris
But that's standard procedure for Spa so the teams should be adjusting for it.

Per ESPN "A set of F1 tyres (minus rims) weigh 42kg when new, but can lose as much as 3kg in wear during a long stint"

So think you'd struggle to get 1.5kg difference between a normal and long stint.
 
But that's standard procedure for Spa so the teams should be adjusting for it.

Per ESPN "A set of F1 tyres (minus rims) weigh 42kg when new, but can lose as much as 3kg in wear during a long stint"

So think you'd struggle to get 1.5kg difference between a normal and long stint.
And picking up Debris - since when is that part of motor racing? But that's something that F1 drivers have been doing for decades as part of the "Technical Compliance"..The teams can't have it both ways, to claim they know tactics to comply with *some* technical requirements but not others.
 
So….
Anyone on here got tickets to a Melbourne Grand Prix (granstand/hospo) after signing yp to Melbourne Grand Prix website to be alerted when tickets go on sale. (Not talking about F1 experiences website).
If so
Q- When do they go on sale roughly (hear its August sometime ie this month 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻🎉)
Q- if so, any luck or hens teeth probability
Q-do the ticketing agencies (think its Ticketmaster) also have sign up for presales?
Q- any other ideas (want reasonable comfort / seating/ views pref on start grid). As we have a place in Melbourne not far from the track no other expenses.

Thanks AF1F1ers😂
 
Ted Kravitz saying on Sky Sport F1 just now that Jack Doohan is a shoe in for Alpine next year. That’ll make 3 Aussies in F1 …..if RIC survives.
 
Just watching P1. A commentator has just said that Marco has confirmed that Liam Lawson will be in a RedBull next year. So RIC or PER in firing line.
If RIC continues his current upswing in form, you'd have to imagine it's PER who's more at risk. There are (reportedly) already more than enough grounds for contract termination based on performance clauses re: PER.
 
If RIC continues his current upswing in form, you'd have to imagine it's PER who's more at risk. There are (reportedly) already more than enough grounds for contract termination based on performance clauses re: PER.
IMHO. Had his chances. Time RIC gave moved on and gave way to other drivers. PER comes with a bucket of money I believe unlike others.
 
Yep, great news! Now just need Danny Ric to be promoted to RBR in place of Checo, and Lawson to be put into Danny's vacated VCARB seat and we'll have near on a quarter of the grid represented by the Antipodes.
How good would that be 🤞🏻
Shame they didn’t do it in the break
 
The Frequent Flyer Concierge team takes the hard work out of finding reward seat availability. Using their expert knowledge and specialised tools, they'll help you book a great trip that maximises the value for your points.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and enjoy a better viewing experience, as well as full participation on our community forums.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to enjoy lots of other benefits and discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top