Really? :| The majority of the few posts I read took the OP to task for calling qantas devious on exactly this point. Maybe not an explicit defense of the practice, but it does imply a certain level of acceptance.
You've got the disadvantage of inexperience. My main gripe with the OP was everything else
but the J/Y awards fubar. I'm not convinced that the entire OP was supposed to be harping on this very point. (There seems to be a perception that this is the case, i.e. the entire argument of the OP was really only to point out this particular problem, whereas I saw multiple points of contention). Then there was the colourful language (to put it nicely) with no backbone to justify it.
From my reading I don't see that at all, more so there are other parts of the OP's post that were taken to task.
I'm not going to single any one post out, but there are a number of attacks on the OP in general (effectively questioning the validity of the original post in its entirety) and there is one post that questions the validity of using 'devious'. That's as far as I got before replying.
Well, as you know it is difficult to take someone seriously if they are going to use choice words without a suitable backup.
And once again, I did agree with the OP that the J/Y awards fubar is not good. I even said that I've sent Qantas a lengthy email describing this failure. I would gladly do it again, every week, until it is fixed.
Hell, I'll even write a physical snail mail letter and send one every week. Look out on a new thread coming your way soon........
Thanks to those who have responded with civility... and a large raspberry to the mob who all piled in for their free kick.
Well, as they say, people in glass houses....... or is it, let he who is without sin......
I was waiting for somebody to bring up the point about either xASA's, JASA, FASA or other sneaky tricks we use here on AFF. Reality is that Joe Blogg's public is not a member of AFF, has no idea about routing through different cities, flies to get from A to B and not to rack up SC's and couldn't care less about the enjoyment of flying from SYD-MEL via PER or similar.
We sometimes forget that here on AFF we have the collective knowledge to get best use of FF rewards and how to wrangle the system, Joe Blogg's doesn't. If I were NOT a member of AFF, not a Platinum FF and knew nothing about flying (90% of the general public) then I would whole heartedly agree with the OP and think the whole QF FF system was a rort.
Sometimes in our lives, our business and our hearts we have to take a step back at look at the situation from the outside in, I assure you it looks very very different.
That is only a validation of a said perception. That doesn't make it true. If 90% of the world thought the world was flat, that doesn't mean the world is flat.
In saying that, we both see the same problem with the search engine. (We meaning both seasoned AFFers and Joe Bloggs.) In this light, we both don't like what we see and we both agree that it needs to be fixed.
As for the rest of the argument, well again it comes down to realising how the system works. Not knowing of it or the frustration thereof forms a perception but it is not the truth; yes, I know perceptions can be a big deal. Anyone is free to hold a perception, and anyone else is free to explain the truth.
Once again, apart from this argument the OP opened up with what is self-admittedly "deliberately inflammatory language". Try to have a level headed conversation when that's the opening card.
* the booking engine does tell you quite clearly that one of your flights is in Y, rather than J, and you have to accept this to proceed
* I don't accept that this practice is "devious" - specifically designed to deceive. It's a stupid glitch, not attempted larceny!
I don't see this as good enough. It's a relatively tedious process if you have to "test" all the combinations of flights presented only to find most are of the J/Y bug kind. And after you mentally block out all the "bad" options, it really begs to reason how many "real" options you have left (sometimes none).
The intent of QF is probably not malicious (i.e. they didn't
actively intend to deceive) but it is a problem. I can understand glitches happen, but no one can deny that they may have consequences. Also, the mere fact it is "just a glitch" doesn't mean it shouldn't be addressed.