This post may well belong on the other thread relating to the Qatar Airways decision (rather than this one about Joe Ashton's piece).
This brouhaha is certainly blowing up the media. About a third of my Facebook News feed is articles and editorials related to this decision.
The elephant in the room is what does this really all mean for Qantas.
Decreased business? A substantial fine? The majority of the workforce resigns? Protest strikes? Qatar goes for the throat?
Everyone goes on and on about the reputational damage; unless that translates to real shift in market, what is the point? A bit like modern politics in a way.
I think history has shown that big airlines have done some horrible things and yet they come out fine - at least, financially - in the end, maybe with a CEO or two being fired or moved on, but that's about it. Qantas would probably have to have a fatal crash before it sees a very big mark on its profitability due to reputational damage. (Note: this is not to wish for a crash, if that's what you're thinking)
Then there are the shareholders. I've said it often what I think about them. Part of me thinks that the company would be doing wrong by its shareholders if it didn't (fervently) oppose the QR application, closing off a threat to the company's profitability even if it was reputationally damaging. It's amazing what can go on when the only yardstick is increasing profit.
Sure, when the red roo goes foul in ways, it seems to cough up a peace offering. The last memorable such time was the fleet grounding.
Those who oppose cancel culture would probably really like to see that kind of effect work right now.
To bring it all back, though, of course, just because there are no negative consequences doesn't mean one should do the wrong thing! That's your civics lesson for today, kids; legal and business students, you may excuse yourselves.
My personal opinion is that it was a dumb decision to say no to QR. Unless it could be argued that QR could have destroyed the Australian market (highly unlikely), then what's the big deal granting the extra rights. Call Qantas an Australian icon, treasure or whatever you like - they're a private company so they can live and die on their own steam. If it lowered fares, great; if it didn't, then where was the bad anyway.