Alan Joyce’s fan fiction fantasy
Most of Alan Joyce’s myths have been swallowed whole by the Australian media, but particularly the fairy story that under him, Qantas became extraordinarily prosperous.
The Profit Terminator
BAM
This is a massive loss for the AFR!![]()
Joe Aston to leave the Financial Review
Joe Aston has decided to resign from The Australian Financial Review following an extraordinary 12 years.www.afr.com
Joe Aston has resigned from The Australian Financial Review. I'm sure champagne corks will be popping across Mascot and at a certain undisclosed location in Europe.
RG’s job?This is a massive loss for the AFR!
I wonder where he's off to next . . .
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
![]()
Joe Aston to leave the Financial Review
Joe Aston has decided to resign from The Australian Financial Review following an extraordinary 12 years.www.afr.com
Joe Aston has resigned from The Australian Financial Review. I'm sure champagne corks will be popping across Mascot and at a certain undisclosed location in Europe.
It's gonna be difficult to pop ol' Dick Goyder off his seat at QF. I'd like to hope it something like the ACCC but realize his expertise may not be in the area (even though he does quite a bit of analysis in the area).RG’s job?
Although this might help move DG on, and perhaps a couple of other DirectorsIt's gonna be difficult to pop ol' Dick Goyder off his seat at QF. I'd like to hope it something like the ACCC but realize his expertise may not be in the area (even though he does quite a bit of analysis in the area).
-RooFlyer88
You missed the point of the comment.If none of those things have been reported in the media how did you learn about them?
Well I think the argument in the article was that if neither our elected officials nor Qantas are compelled to reveal such unethical behaviour how can the media or citizens find out? The only sure fire way I suppose is to assume the worst for the lot.If none of those things have been reported in the media how did you learn about them?
I suppose there are limits to how far one could take that kind of approach.The only sure fire way I suppose is to assume the worst for the lot.
Well the argument goes at some point speech crosses a line where it becomes libellous and at that point the alleged victim can assert their rights. But in doing so there is a discovery process where the defendant can dig up what they want on the person being libelled. An argument of privacy can no longer be used by Qantas when faced by a subpoena in a civil matter.I suppose there are limits to how far one could take that kind of approach.
You missed the point of the comment.
Possibly. But a fair question to ask is for the sources because if the claims hold to any degree, that would cross to bribery and warrant much more airtime and investigation. I'd be interested to know about what might be true in this vs fiction onlyAssume the OP was trying to be funny again.
Yes, unfortunately the post did not include any well positioned emojis. Emoji's such asAssume the OP was trying to be funny again.
