I think some people don't quite get that whatever denigrating or derogatory attacks on AJ are being directed at him is an expression of the disgust at him and his position.
Unacceptable? Maybe, but it does tell you how many people - or rather, how badly some people - want AJ gone, irrespective of the means. The tactics so employed are perhaps a degeneration from the fact that the frequent criticisms of his management technique (the reportedly most diplomatic, proper and genteel way of "dealing with it") have not yielded the desired result. Countless accusative blog posts, news reports, shareholder outbursts, ex-staff revolts (and even a few salvos from JB)...... he's still there...
AJ has had a noted threat on his life before. If that's not a statement of how much some people want him gone - unacceptable or not - I don't know what is.