During acceleration, how long would it take for the IAS to increase by 30knots when close to V1?
Many variables would affect that. Ten seconds or so, I guess.
From my reading of this, the FO has only reacted to an ECAM, and has then locked on the the N1 vibration. The fact that he can’t differentiate between N1 and engine 1 is appalling in it’s own right. But, I’m surprised he has had any warning from the ECAM at all. These systems inhibit most warnings, including fires, above various speeds in the 80 to 100 knot region. The damage they have would not have given the PIC any swing, and the engine would have been producing full thrust. The decision to go is quite understandable, and is within the Airbus flight crew training manual guidance.
At rejected takeoff, which are more effective?. Auto or manual brakes?
Auto braking is generally applied sooner. In RTO mode, it sends all of the hydraulic power to the brakes, without any modulation or reduction, and lets the anti skid take control. You can’t get anything more than that manually.
They were lucky that the damage was limited to the two fan blades, and that the only actual problem they had was some vibration. Given their subsequent actions, I very much doubt that this aircraft would have ever flown again if the engine had actually failed.
I’m not surprised at the quick repair. Replace the blades. Put the fan back together in a sequence that would keep it in balance. All blades are individually weighed, and there’s computer programs that give assembly sequences for any given set of blades. Have a look at the engine for other damage. That’s a total of a couple of hours work. Saw it done for a 767 in Perth once.