An international expert on planning healthy cities has warned Sydney against following the Asian model of concentrating high rise around train stations to house a booming population.
Dubbing it "suburban cellulite", the clusters of towers were designed to give maximum patronage to private railways and retailers, but are now being regretted by Chinese planners, says Guy Perry of construction firm AECOM.
"People are not happy there," he says.
The International Monetary Fund, one of the world's most important financial institutions, drew attention to this part of Australia's housing story in a recent report on the nation's residential prices. The IMF economists noted that, despite Australia's huge size, our population is highly urbanised. But the very large population share of our two biggest cities sets us apart from most other highly urbanised advanced nations.
The most recent population estimates by the Bureau of Statistics showed 9.3 million people live in Sydney and Melbourne, or four in every 10 Australians. It is very uncommon for just two cities to account for such a large portion of the population.
The IMF's figures showed Japan's two largest cities, Tokyo and Yokohama, account for less than 10 per cent of the total population. London and Birmingham, Britain's two biggest cities, make up less than 20 per cent of the population.
We have learned nothing from what's been going on in overpopulated cities overseas.
Those high density apartments built in Hurstville and Bankstown ~20 years ago are now slums.
And what population boom unless you are thinking of bringing in another 25 million in the next 10 years?
*wears flame suit*
Creating so called "slums" may not be the intended consequence however if building all these high density units lead to a situation where supply is much more than demand, then prices in theory should plateau or come down and thus make it more affordable for the younger generation, lower incomes and those who simple can't afford the current prices.
If high(er) density properties cause a loss of amenity to the nearby area, again that may be a good thing to curb demand to the nearby area or those properties become slightly less favorable.
Even though we are homeowners, the cost of homes in Sydney, right now, is ridiculous and I am all for house prices to come down. It is crazy that an ordinary home in an average Sydney suburb is easily over a million dollars.
At the end of the day, good properties in good location will always be the key.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
What?? Another "Foreigner" pinching our properties??
Considering the global financial turmoil atm, interest rate is unlikely to move up too soon, even in the US. Newspapers reported many borrowers were moving to fix rates. I wonder if there's room yet to move down.
Yet, according to the survey to be released on Monday, only 2 per cent of the high earners define themselves as upper class and only 31 per cent as upper middle class.
Almost half (44 per cent), say they are middle class. A further 10 per cent say they are lower middle class, and 13 per cent working class.
Many households in the top 10 per cent struggle to save. The survey finds one in five live "pay cheque to pay cheque", spending everything they earn.
Illustration: Matt Golding
Two out of three say the cost of maintaining their mortgage is "having a big impact on their lifestyle".
No Cookies | Perth Now
While I feel some sympathy for this woman's situation, surely any "ordinary income earner" would think there was something not right in being offered loans worth $6.5 million.
"The Australian housing bubble could not have become as ridiculous as it is without the help of easy financing," he writes.
"Over the past few years, over 40 per cent of all new mortgages originated have been interest-only mortgages.
"This is truly Ponzi financing, where home buyers only make money if their houses keep rising in value," he writes, later describing interest only loans as a "disaster waiting to happen."