medhead
Suspended
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2008
- Posts
- 19,074
Apparently some examples are being given of jobs that can afford a house. That doesn't actually prove a thing. They're the ones with the good jobs that pay good money. Woopity do. Their are plenty of people with good jobs that don't pay the good money to buy a house in Sydney. We don't even need to go anywhere near unemployed to find those people.
It is a measure. Apparently the appropriate one for housing. That seems reasonable compared to using an average. But to the crux of your post, do you believe the range of house prices has expanded so that the bottom is fixed and the top is much much greater than when you purchased? Or is it possible that the bottom and top of the range have also experienced similar increases?
I don't know why the concept of median house price is brought up when discussing first home buying. There is no way I could have afforded a house in the "median" price bracket when I bought my first home. It was not until my third home that I got close to the median market price. My first home was probably more like 25% of the median price at the time, because that was all I could afford. 25 years later I can afford to purchase in the median price range.
It is a measure. Apparently the appropriate one for housing. That seems reasonable compared to using an average. But to the crux of your post, do you believe the range of house prices has expanded so that the bottom is fixed and the top is much much greater than when you purchased? Or is it possible that the bottom and top of the range have also experienced similar increases?