- Joined
- Nov 12, 2012
- Posts
- 27,990
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Virgin
- Platinum
- Star Alliance
- Silver
View attachment 250954
Well, there you go. Such are the adances in medical science that infectious outbreaks are now able to be ended by Public Health statements.
As opposed to it just being based quarantine and testing protocols with the advice that they are no longer required?
View attachment 250954
Well, there you go. Such are the adances in medical science that infectious outbreaks are now able to be ended by Public Health statements.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Based on the quote you presented, and I quoted ... yes!!
I do not follow your logic at all. Where does it state that an infectious outbreak are now able to be ended by Public Health statements
Well, there you go. Such are the adances in medical science that infectious outbreaks are now able to be ended by Public Health statements.
Oh dear. Here we go again. You move the goal posts. Let me explain.
You posted:
View attachment 250965
I replied:
Public? Yes ... its available to you and me. Health statement? yes, I think thats obvious (well, to me, anyway )
I know this is going to go on and on and on forever, with nit-picking on the dictionary definition of every word, so go ahead. But honestly, its trivial, no-one cares, so knock yourself out, and obsess on it. I'm going to watch some telly.
I know this is going to go on and on and on forever, with nit-picking on the dictionary definition of every word, so go ahead. But honestly, its trivial, no-one cares, so knock yourself out, and obsess on it.
Snap!And I doubt that very few people would regard a statement from a privately held aged care facility as a Public Health statement.
I can't speak for the OP, but to me the article seemed to suggest the outbreak was declared over in an officious manner rather than it being confirmed that being x days after the last infection that it is over. Not a big enough deal for an argument.
I'm pretty sure if it had been any other state it wouldn't have been raised at all.
Who cares whether someone publicly declares it over, or privately advises it's over. Or makes a statement or doesn't, it's almost nitpicky to the nth degree. I think we can all agree .. it's over!
And I am more than pretty sure that it was the way the notice was presented had more to do with it (in my case) than the state where it occurred. I must check some of the NSW clusters to see if something similar gets posted - perhaps it does?I'm pretty sure if it had been any other state it wouldn't have been raised at all.
Who cares whether someone publicly declares it over, or privately advises it's over. Or makes a statement or doesn't, it's almost nitpicky to the nth degree. I think we can all agree .. it's over!
There are National guidelines and definitions of an outbreak in a residential aged care facility.And I am more than pretty sure that it was the way the notice was presented had more to do with it (in my case) than the state where it occurred. I must check some of the NSW clusters to see if something similar gets posted - perhaps it does?
I can't speak for the OP, but to me the article seemed to suggest the outbreak was declared over in an officious manner rather than it being confirmed that being x days after the last infection that it is over. Not a big enough deal for an argument.
Of course it goes without saying that NSW is open to Vic.From the ABC.
— New Zealand has announced that Victorians will be able to fly there quarantine-free from midnight tonight.
Tasmania and the Northern Territory are also welcoming people travelling from Victoria, but Queensland, South Australia and Western Australia aren't there yet.
COVIDSafe app
My local federal MP still has it on his phone. He is the only person I personally know who still does.I dont know anyone still using this battery draining app.