But it was obvious what Peta Credlin was there for. IMHO, she was mainly focused on looking for a smoking gun, and really went down a rabbit hole. Looking back (with the benefit of hindsight), 12 months later, the decision to use private security - which was so much of a focus - meant that other problems were largely glossed over. It's quite evident that problems ran deep in DHHS - ranging from infection control procedures, contractor supervision, staff culture, speed of acting on data, contract tracing capabilities, poor IT systems, so much was wrong. Yet most of the journalists (including Peta) seemed to gloss over them in their quest to determine, essentially, whether the Premier made the decision around employing private security. If any other of a range of processes had been in place, it would not have mattered that private security was used.