Australian Reports of the Virus Spread

Status
Not open for further replies.
So Victoria locks down to prevent a "Sydney style lockdown", but by the end of August they will have done six weeks lockdown to Sydney's nine. Looks like a "Sydney style lockdown" without the cases.

What is does show is that lockdown is not solution number 1 to this virus anymore. Worked well as a policy last year, but not sustainable anymore. I'd like to think that if the governments are so worried about hospitals overcrowding, they might have I don't know... boosted capacity in the past 18 months....

You mean that bit where we flattened the curve, while the state governments readied their health systems. That's an idea that didn't seem to take hold in many state governments.
 
Just finishing up the press conf from sydney today, it does seem worrying that they are talking about watching case numbers after 80% the whole IDEA of high vaccination is watching hospitlisations / deaths and ignoring case numbers is what we have been told and now they are REPEATEDLY saying case numbers after 80%
 
Just finishing up the press conf from sydney today, it does seem worrying that they are talking about watching case numbers after 80% the whole IDEA of high vaccination is watching hospitlisations / deaths and ignoring case numbers is what we have been told and now they are REPEATEDLY saying case numbers after 80%
Yep, this is the point when the consensus starts to break down.
 
I think if nothing else, this latest outbreak in Melbourne should put a stop to any state trying to impose its system of dealing with Covid on another. I think a lot of it is pure luck.

So many cries about non-compliance in Sydney, yet we're seeing the exact same thing occur in Melbourne. In fact day for day, Melbourne has had more cases in this outbreak, mostly in lockdown, than Sydney did without being locked down.
 
Nothing stopping you buying alcohol from Dan Murphys or Liquorland and doing the same thing.

You missed the rule now on not removing a mask ioutdoors to consume alcohol.

Poor behaviour observed, and rules changed now to address the problem.

Where's the enforcement on the streets? It's a bit hard to hide a "pop up beer garden" as he calls it. And from my experience, those things get noisy.

Not sure why you think there is no enforcement? Many reports of people being fined etc. Unfortunately some do not do what they should.

And yes gatherings have been broken up, and a large one planned prevented from happing.

Selfish people exist, and will seek to end and break. One person in this thread was advocating walking with a different person each day which is hardly minimising mixing. That is 7 households, and if those 7 then walk with others you soon get scores of households.
 
I think it was noted Peacock Inn was promoting a "walk, talk and sip".
The venue itself denies that that was the case. It seems like it was more impromptu. And a local private residence provided the music.

Sage advice at the end...

1629084902318.png
 
You missed the rule now on not removing a mask in outdoors to consume alcohol.

Poor behaviour observed, and rules changed now to address the problem.



Not sure why you think there is no enforcement? Many reports of people being fined etc. Unfortunately some do not do what they should.

And yes gatherings have been broken up, and a large one planned prevented from happing.

Selfish people exist, and will seek to end and break. One person in this thread was advocating walking with a different person each day which is hardly minimising mixing. That is 7 households, and if those 7 then walk with others you soon get scores of households.

Sorry it just seems ridiculous to me that you need a rule to stop people removing masks to drink alcohol, when they shouldn't be there in the first place. Even a blanket "you can't drink alcohol outside" would have made more sense - but I guess they were trying to force it in the health order.
 
The venue itself denies that that was the case. It seems like it was more impromptu. And a local private residence provided the music.

Sage advice at the end...

View attachment 255739
Perhaps - ABC reporting the Vic Police

'Absolutely outrageous behaviour': Victoria Police chief says the actions of a few have not been good enough​

Police Chief Commissioner Shane Patton says there has been concerning behaviour in the Melbourne community over the past week.

“We’ve seen some really disappointing behaviour, we’ve seen some selfish behaviour, and some absolutely outrageous behaviour,” he said.

He gave examples including the Richmond pub crawl as well as some near the Peacock Hotel playing music in the park and people sitting in the street drinking.

“Every one of these things is just totally unacceptable and everybody knows they’re doing the wrong thing,” he said.

“We’ve seen so many different breaches, it’s just ridiculous and it has to stop.”
 
Turn business expenses into Business Class! Process $10,000 through pay.com.au to score 20,000 bonus PayRewards Points and join 30k+ savvy business owners enjoying these benefits:

- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Sorry it just seems ridiculous to me that you need a rule to stop people removing masks to drink alcohol, when they shouldn't be there in the first place. Even a blanket "you can't drink alcohol outside" would have made more sense - but I guess they were trying to force it in the health order.

Unfortunately selfish people abound.

Either rule would be ok. Point being is that there now is a clear rule that police can enforce and probably more importantly it makes it clearer to all that people cannot l linger anywhere outside drinking alcohol and socialising. Simple is good for police.

Whether it be outside a pub, or in a park.

The South Yarra Coffee Drinkers were being cracked down on over the weekend.
 
Selfish people exist, and will seek to end and break. One person in this thread was advocating walking with a different person each day which is hardly minimising mixing. That is 7 households, and if those 7 then walk with others you soon get scores of households.

Absolutely nothing illegal about walking with 1 other person per day, outdoors and masked. No state requires that it is the same person every day. All parties involved are fully vaccinated, live in the same LGA in single person households and no physical contact.

So all much safer than those who go to the supermarket everyday and interact with a cashier rather than self check out.

And many times safer than what you do by entering more than one other household to give care, some of whom aren't fully vaccinated.

I"ve not broken any rules, and given my suburb has zero cases am confident going for a walk with another person isnt going to change that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you walk with a different person each day of the week, then that is 7 people per week.

It's still completely legal.

What we were talking about something that was already illegal, by putting an additional rule against it, to make it doubly illegal (you're out here drinking, there's a fine, and you've removed your mask, there's another).

No comparison really.
 
Unfortunately selfish people abound.

Either rule would be ok. Point being is that there now is a clear rule that police can enforce and probably more importantly it makes it clearer to all that people cannot l linger anywhere outside drinking alcohol and socialising. Simple is good for police.

Whether it be outside a pub, or in a park.

The South Yarra Coffee Drinkers were being cracked down on over the weekend.
Certainly in Sydney many areas are subject to a ban on alcohol drinking in public places - this is a local council regulation. Victoria has the same in many areas.

 
It's still completely legal.

What we were talking about something that was already illegal, by putting an additional rule against it, to make it doubly illegal (you're out here drinking, there's a fine, and you've removed your mask, there's another).

No comparison really.

So it is laws and not preventing spread that you are concerned with?

Enforcement has been made simpler for police.
 
So it is laws and not preventing spread that you are concerned with?

Enforcement has been made simpler for police.

If NSW Health were concerned about it, they'd make a rule against it.

They put in the rule about only one person shopping at a time (I saw Woolworths refuse entry to one member of a couple yesterday).

You're free to live your life as you see fit, but you can't enforce your rules on others.
 
You're free to live your life as you see fit, but you can't enforce your rules on others.

And this is a big part of our whole problem. Rules changing on an almost daily basis means people just make it up for themselves.

If only we’d had a single set of National rules established 18 months ago… we’d never be in this position. The mistake was the on again-off again rules from state to state. GB actually had it right in May 2020 when she said “this isn’t over until we have a vaccine”. So why did we try to end it early?
 
And this is a big part of our whole problem. Rules changing on an almost daily basis means people just make it up for themselves.

If only we’d had a single set of National rules established 18 months ago… we’d never be in this position. The mistake was the on again-off again rules from state to state. GB actually had it right in May 2020 when she said “this isn’t over until we have a vaccine”. So why did we try to end it early?
Based on her comments today it's still not over even with a vaccine.
 
It's just sad to me that otherwise (allegedly...) intelligent people who are in government fail to see that continuing to laud the majority while punishing the majority leads to people losing interest and not listening to what you are saying.

Maybe those in government are not so intelligent?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top