Australian Reports of the Virus Spread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Very true. People will get excited about anything if it's marketed. Covid has been blown up to such a scale that one case within a km has people fearing for their lives. Possibly the hysteria was necessary to get people to take notice but if it's overdone, it will run foul of the "cry wolf" problem. I suspect this is already happening.

Agree, they need some level of ‘hysteria’ to galvanise some action - which in this case is primarily to go and get a vaccine and this is now (finally) going well, particularly in NSW and VIC.

So NSW removing a chunk of exposure sites form public view ongoing won’t really damage this. I mean would you really care if your local supermarket had a low risk case? I don’t care anymore.
 
So interestingly NSW Health is releasing the FULL exposure list to some organisations for ‘research purposes’ but just not publishing it anymore publicly.

I guess we don’t publish flu exposure sites so this is a first step to reducing the anxiety of people by reducing the amount of information available and changing to ‘assume it is just everywhere, all the time and behave accordingly’.

Sigh and of course the press leap on it and label it as ‘giving up’…. more like living with the new reality - which we all need to get on board with now…

——

Sydney has given up : change in covid reporting omits supermarkets, other venues​


Today it has been revealed that authorities in the state have raised the white flag on identifying venues visited by Covid cases – as infections continue to steadily rise.

Residents on social media had noticed the change over the past few days, asking why venues of concern in Sydney were not being listed by authorities despite the lion’s share of cases occurring in the city.

Now The Daily Telegraph has revealed that, under a new risk-based approach, places like supermarkets and shopping centres across Sydney won’t be added to the list of venues of concern, which had already become days out of date.

 

This is unacceptable. No preventative health service should be suspended.
Yes it is. But based on my experience of witnessing Covid risk aversion from some in Health Care this will likely be an internal decision by that service.
They should be called out on it and have to provide a service.
 
Can the NSW Govt please allow dental services to reopen as well?

Some dentists are open for essential work (not check ups), a friend of mine had a root canal done yesterday. It is up to the practice whether they open, most are open reduced hours if they are outside LGAs of concern.

Dentists perfect opportunity to trial vaccination privileges for allowing preventative work for fully vaccinated staff and patients.
 
Last edited:
Maybe this is something Australia should be putting in at 70% double vaxxed to help stop the spread of the virus here? If our government had a backbone...

-----

Canada bans unvaccinated airline passengers​


The Canadian government will soon require all air travellers and passengers on interprovincial trains to be vaccinated against COVID-19.

Transport Minister Omar Alghabra said Friday that includes all commercial air travellers, passengers on trains between provinces and cruise ship passengers.


Well Qantas have just formally announced (with dates) all its employees will be required to be vaccinated to help stop the virus spread.

VA2 and Rex will now need to follow and fast. Who would want to fly with unvaccinated staff in your face. I will not be flying an airline that does not do this.

——

Breaking

Qantas mandates vaccines for all staff​



Qantas will make COVID-19 vaccinations mandatory for all staff from at least mid-November after a survey showed three quarters of staff backed the move, in a major step for one of Australia’s largest employers.

Frontline staff like cabin crew, pilots and airport workers will need to have gotten the jab by November 15.

 
Last edited:
Well Qantas have just formally announced (with dates) all its employees will be required to be vaccinated to help stop the virus spread

Good news, shame the federal and state governments arent legislating to provide greater protections for employers when they introduce vaccination requirements.

Our governments could lead by example requiring all their employees to be vaccinated (as some overseas jurisdictions have done) .
 
Turn business expenses into Business Class! Process $10,000 through pay.com.au to score 20,000 bonus PayRewards Points and join 30k+ savvy business owners enjoying these benefits:

- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

A shadow Federal Minister has a daughter aged under 16 who has tested positive. She is outraged that her under 16 year old hasn't already been vaccinated. Like so many things in life, politicians, judges, etc just don't give a hoot until it happens to them.
 
Well Qantas have just formally announced (with dates) all its employees will be required to be vaccinated to help stop the virus spread.

VA2 and Rex will now need to follow and fast. Who would want to fly with unvaccinated staff in your face. I will not be flying an airline that does not do this.
Qantas mandates vaccines for all staff
Qantas will make COVID-19 vaccinations mandatory for all staff from at least mid-November after a survey showed three quarters of staff backed the move, in a major step for one of Australia’s largest employers.

Frontline staff like cabin crew, pilots and airport workers will need to have gotten the jab by November 15.
Good move, a necessary move, let's hope it doesn't bring some knobs out that say you can't make me get vaccinated.
AJ really should have stated this earlier, but I guess legal advice on this would be of upmost importance.

You know VA will follow, QF always 1st to ann anything.

Rex I have no idea of, but then again I wouldn't really know what any airlines will do, how would I, haha!
 
Given the number of staff that were stood down, there will be a miles long queue of people ready to replace any numpty employee refusing to get vaccinated.
And any employer who is struggling for staff, hospitality? may not be able to do this.
 
It pains me to say it, but time for a NZ style lockdown (ie, shut down food and beverage, no more click and collect - just essential groceries)
 
NSW Health were asked why they're not updating Greater Sydney locations at all & revealed they've stopped listing 'low risk' environments like shops. Yet the transmission at a shop in Bondi Junction Westfield was so 'scary' according to Brad Hazzard & how this spread. Not that long ago there was a warning about shopping centre toilets.

The practice of not listing shops etc dates back at least to 23rd July when the Royal Randwick Shopping Centre with 2 CV+ shoppers over several consecutive days was never listed, and finally after intervention by local MP writing to Health did a response come back about no longer listing certain venues.

NSW health started this process of removing previously displayed information - especially about mystery cases and issues with contact tracing, much earlier - July 9th to be precise.



For three days, after Kerry Chant was asked about mystery cases, this detail was provided. Then removed from the daily NSW Coronavirus Statistics release.

When I posted about the NSW Contact Tracing's ability being more myth than reality, some took offence and stated that the figures I provided were wrong - so I published the NSW Health definitions.

Last week a journalist asked me for more detail, which is below.
2021 07 09 NSW Health Contact tracing stops transparency.jpg
Over a 2 day period the number of unlinked infection chains of transmission went from 25 to 37. On the July 7th release a total of 26% cases were due to 25 separate 'unidentified' sources. Two days it was later 35%. Of all new Covid cases announced from day to day at that stage - 4 in 5 were from these unlinked chains - then NSW Health stopped producing the information. Today it is in the mid 90% range, or around 19 out of 20 cases.

Have a look at the 11am media briefings in early July - Gladys & Brad kept blaming extended families mixing with one another. The data does not support this.

The number of people linked to each 'unlinked chain' averaged between just two or three people - suggests solely household contacts. Not the 'large families' that Gladys & Brad kept blaming for causing the spread. Quite possible in one or two instances that happened, but clearly not with the then 37 of the 38 chains of infection transmission.

Fast forward to August 17th and the unlinked/unsourced separate chains of infection now number over 3,200. If just one household contact that would account for 6,400 of 8,654 total CV cases detected. As we regularly hear from Brad Hazzard - close to 100% of household contacts end up positive - implies NSW Contact tracing stopped finding sources for true 'Mystery Cases' in late June.

BTW: You've probably noticed I adjusted the total mystery unlinked separate cases down. Reported as 3,464 yesterday however the 'unknown source' figure mentioned each day is somewhat misleading. It consists of 2 distinct components:
  1. Cases contacted that day and no source revealed/found - virtually all 'links' since the last week of June have been from people telling the contact tracers that they are household contacts or close contacts of someone already testing positive. CCTV footage viewing is.
  2. Case yet to be contacted - cases where not yet allocated to a contact group, cases not yet rung, cases rung with no answer.
These numbers are not 'publicly disclosed' but are without it being realised as someone involved pointed out.

1629242504326.png
The difference between the 2 numbers (323 - 297) = 26 = how many people were contacted by phone, and in many cases, just asked asked a few questions including if they have someone else in their household or a close contact who has tested positive in the last fortnight & answer 'No', have they been in insolation, if so from what date, & how do they feel, shortness of breath etc.

The 297 are the number of people who have not been spoken with from that days' positive results. They get added to the queue after any remaining cases from prior days. Due to spam, hoax calls & scams - some people don't answer the calls for several days despite receiving the sms telling them to contact NSW Health.

This growing backlog downplays the workload churned through by the contact tracers.

Some tracers are consigned to predominantly trying to contact +ve cases from two or more processing days ago, and most to clearing the backlog from the previous day's processing (the 297). Using yesterday's stats for the work done yesterday - they'd attempted to contact those from 2+ days ago & tried to contact the 297 for the first time + contacted (if similar figures released today Aug 18th) + 129 + 26 = 452 + those finally reached from more than 2 days ago, on a good day that can be another 35 to 40 cases, on a bad day less than 10. So yesterday possibly close to 500 in total if today's number does not change significantly.

There is another calculation that I won't detail that reveals how many of the 'linked cases' announced each day are actually linked to an unlinked mystery case.

NSW Health decided to present the data this way instead of having a separate line showing 'Cases remaining to be contacted/interviewed' as per a directive from the Health Minister's office.

This has the stats people using a reconciliation spreadsheet to produce the daily statistics release among outher output, and occasionally they forget to clear one input box (as was seen a couple of days ago with difference between the total cases figure from one day to the next being much greater than the number of cases declared on the day. This is roughly what they start with.

Aug 17th

452 new cases
S (out of the 129) linked to sourced chain of infection transmission
U (129 - S) linked to unsourced chain of infection transmission
26 unlinked to any source
297 remain to be contacted.

XYZ contacted from previous days' announced cases

A linked to sourced chain of infection transmission
B linked to unsourced chain of infection transmission
C unlinked to any source (new mystery chain)
D remain to be contacted.

Cases added/removed from count, from previous released case numbers (subsequently decided false positives, data entry error etc)

Mystery case linked to a source

Cases unlinked and no longer under investigation

Total Case to date
...and totals for all of the above virtually.
___________________________________________________________

The results from this are the Daily announced statistics covering new cases, total cases to date etc.
 
275D10E3-7D96-4682-A94E-AE44BD8BAF07.jpeg
7 infectious in the community.

Lockdown won’t be ending for Newcastle.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top