justinbrett
Senior Member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2006
- Posts
- 9,748
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Oneworld
- Emerald
- Star Alliance
- Gold
The government would never say "WFH has to end". WFH existed before covid. It will exist after covid, when it suits the employee and employer.The government can influence WFH indirectly by allowing businesses to point to government guidance that WFH has to end. WFH is an agreement between you and the employer, and employers can come up with all sorts of reasons why they need staff in the office rather than at home. WFH is not guaranteed in most workplaces.
If we're looking to stop the spread of the virus, WFH is a key element. The government's aspirations seem to directly contradict that, even if we have 70 or 80% vaccination.
An employer is entitled to require its employees to come to the office.
Stopping the spread is the 2020/21 mantra. In 2022 we won't even know the extent it is out there, most people will be asymptomatic and I doubt we will be testing anywhere near the extent we are now.
Time to put the doona away.