justinbrett
Senior Member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2006
- Posts
- 9,871
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Oneworld
- Emerald
- Star Alliance
- Gold
The subsequent modelling indicated not so.
You may wish to a read through the Burnett Modelling
That is correct, including nationally.
But by 19 September after the modelling was redone it was built into the plan.
So you are now changing the topic from opening early to elimination?
The roadmap is about living with Covid permanently and so elimination had to be by definition a temporary phase. You cannot have living with Covid and elimination (which is living without Covid).
Yes the Vic Gov hoped to get to the 70/80 levels with zero cases but that was not to be. Why would that not be the aspiration if it could have happened?
However the virus had built enough community transmission to mean that only a complete lockdown could have suppressed it, but by that time the vaccination rollout was well underway and so the path became as per the 19 Sept Roadmap with its defined public health measures to suppress transmission till enough vaccinations had occurred (ie 70/80 settings).
I see that as reacting to virus transmission that was occurring and not political pressure.
The protests were about not vaccinating and about opening up immediately. Neither happened.
It is early by the then definition of Victoria - in that they would not open with hundreds (or indeed thousands of cases). There was much noise against NSW for saying it would open under those conditions. Dan Andrews slammed NSW and Sydney in nearly every press conference he did (feel free to go through the archives, it was widely noted and commented on in this thread).
People choose to remember what they want. Luckily this thread has over 30,000 posts to document what actually happened.
I'm not sure why you keep bringing up events that happened in September, when my argument was the events in August was one of the drivers that encouraged them down that path.