The AFL players have not been in a genuine iso bubble unlike say the Auckland Warriors (in a hotel away from everyone but the team) because they have been living with their families and have kids who have been going to schools in hot spots.
They are tested at least one a week, so if any of them are positive, or become positive, then you will soon know about it. Whereas if that 1000 odd people were instead all sacked as you prefer and catch Covid 19 it may take some time before it is infected, and indeed it is actually much more likely for them to spread Covid19 if they are no longer employed as AFL players, trainers, coaches, physios etc. Is that not actually a greater risk?
There must be very few Australians who are tested weekly. Even less where everyone of their close work colleagues is also tested weekly. Very soon all will have been in zones with low or no CV19 cases. Despite this they will still be tested weekly.
Kid to adult transmission is very rare. Moreo if they are very young, and most AFL players are not old enough to have teenagers. AFL teams admin support is 100% separated from the football department, even before this week. My own club took that to extremes with all Admin located 25km away from the Football Department.
I personally would be more about people who are not being tested, or may be get tested once and then may catch it later.
Are the players really a significant risk of spreading Covid19? Foxtel, the media and others have all stood down vast numbers of staff throughout Australia. One of my daughters who was at Foxtel and hundreds of her workmates from around Australia were retrenched last month. Many many more were retrenched earlier on. Without the revenue that the AFL/NRL/A-league/Netball/Basketball generate many many more would be stood down.
There are definite non-Covid19 health risks to the unemployed. Not all have the advantage that my daughter has in parents that can accommodate her (Though she is a proactive young lady who has already gained another position with Suncorp).
So we need to balance risk. I fully understand and support ban normal Victorians from travelling at present . But to stop AFL players from all states from playing given how they are managed and tested at present would in my opinion cause a lot of heath problems, cause huge economic damage and most likely make little or do difference in preventing the spread of Covid 19. Indeed if that 1000 odd AFL staff were put back into the general populace where they will not be tested frequently and so the risk of them catching and spreading Covid 19 would probably be higher.
AFL/NRL/A-league/Netball/Basketball being played is of benefit to many both directly and indirectly. Is there really enough of a significant Covid19 risk that justifies not having those benefits?