Weren’t 200 ( or thereabouts) sent into isolation as a result?
To me that’s a large number and unnecessary to have gathered in the first place, under ‘stage 4’ environment.
Under Stage 4 there are still quite a number of workplaces and industries that have been permitted to still operate under Covid safe conditions.
1/ You use the term gathered/ gatherings in a different way than is the convention during this pandemic.
While you are of course free to offer your opinion on what is permitted or not, it was permitted. Many others in the media are still working and no one seems to be demanding that they all cease working.
2/ If a permitted workplace has a positive case then actions follow.
There are multiple workplaces that have had to close in recent weeks, or partly close, when a team member gets a positive result to allow for staff testing, cleaning etc..
You have challenged many criticisms and passionately defended Victoria’s response, ‘Dan‘ in particular, and passion and loyalty are to be respected. But I suggest that those in the eye of the storm do not have the full perspective. I have been criticising my own state and Premier’s handling of the situation here,albeit because of their over caution. None of our governments are without fault and we give them latitude as the whole situation is almost unprecedented. But not carte blanche ( not that you have suggested that). Unfortunately for Victoria, the microscope is on it and faults are being exposed. It would probably be the same in any jurisdiction with the same scrutiny with a large outbreak. Here’s hoping the numbers keep coming down and the pressure will soon be off.
I strongly refute your assertion that I have blind loyalty to Dan and only take a pro-Dan stance, and your implication that the Vic Government is without fault.
It has nothing to do with loyalty. I look at the facts which is why I questioned that dubious graph in The Australian. I question the source of that graph as it was not in alignment with all of the other public data at the time. If someone states that the BLM caused cases in the apartment towers then I point the to the actual factual statements on what happened.
I have made both negative criticisms and positive criticisms of the Victorian response.
ie Many negative comments on the hotel quarantine failure. On observing that family gatherings were showing up in the data causing spread early in the second wave I questioned this before the Vic Gov acted to restrict it. A bit later I posted that I was fearful that the Vic Gov was acting too slowly with further restrictions and offered the opinion that they were being a week too slow with enacting measures.
With the Masked Singer I note that it was a permitted workplace under under stage 4.
Permitted workplaces are not immune from an employee bringing the infection onsite.
To me the issues are:
- Were appropriate procedures followed by the company concerned bother before the case and after it. Based on the reports to date both seem to have been the case.
- And what should be permitted to still operate . ie Should all tv shows not operate?