I never suggested you need to wait for the results to treat the person. You can do the same risk assessment that you do now to decide who is high risk and needs to be put in an orange bed pending a result.
But test everyone, so in the event you miss an asymptomatic person when doing the admission risk assessment, you can then move them within a day, instead of waiting for symptoms to appear which could be many days later.
Testing all those who are admitted (never said anything about everyone who attend the ER (we all kow too many people go to the ER when they should go to their GP just to avoid paying for for a consult) will give everyone greater certainty that there is not more undetected community transmission.
As a data point my Dad had a day procedure done at private hopsital recently, he was surveyed re his movements int he 2 weeks lead-up and tested as part of the check in, its standard policy at that provate hopsital. Even though he hadnt been to any high risk locations and had no symnptoms and he was home when he got the result.
WRT to rapid tests, I was lead to believe the saliva testes were cheaper (although less accurate) than the swab tests as they do not require a pathologist. If we are paying $3k, then how can airlines in Europe afford to offer them at much less to clear travelelrs at airports? And why was Dan suggestign they may start using these at MEL?
Im quite horrfied that all hospital staff interacting with patients arent wearing full PPE during a pandemic. Givent he high risk of workign in a hospital, i would not want a nurse, doctor or orderly to come near me without wearing a mask and face shield.