Lynda2475
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Posts
- 9,050
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Virgin
- Red
- Oneworld
- Emerald
Allowing 1000+ arrivals for the AO is high risk. Tennis has had many high profile players and suport team test postive at multiple tournaments over the last year.
But my main objection is that one of the reasons Vic hasnt been pulling its weight with overseas arrivals, still accepting less than 50% of what they were prior to the second wave despite supposedly improving their systems is in part because they are reserving hotel capacity for the 1000+ AO arrivals all coming in from high risk locations like UK, Europe and US whilst preventing thousands of Vitcorians who were in NSW regional green zones from returning home.
I do not believe that the economic benefit of holding the AO is more than the long term benefit of letting Victorians return home from NSW/Qld and getting Australians home from overseas.
The focus on extraordinary efforts to host sporting events like the Cricket and AO, just reinforces politial motivations of state govenrment decisions, rather than doing what is best for Australians.
But my main objection is that one of the reasons Vic hasnt been pulling its weight with overseas arrivals, still accepting less than 50% of what they were prior to the second wave despite supposedly improving their systems is in part because they are reserving hotel capacity for the 1000+ AO arrivals all coming in from high risk locations like UK, Europe and US whilst preventing thousands of Vitcorians who were in NSW regional green zones from returning home.
I do not believe that the economic benefit of holding the AO is more than the long term benefit of letting Victorians return home from NSW/Qld and getting Australians home from overseas.
The focus on extraordinary efforts to host sporting events like the Cricket and AO, just reinforces politial motivations of state govenrment decisions, rather than doing what is best for Australians.
Last edited: