An interesting summary and very telling by states responses - which is basically at the complete discretion of the CHO at the end of the day with some 'guiding principles' that can be taken into / out of account if they feel like it on the day, but in the case of WA - no guiding principles at all (unsurprisingly...)
----
Most borders are still closed to NSW after the last COVID-19 outbreak in the state
NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian this week bemoaned the fact Australia had no COVID-19 hotspots, and questioned why most domestic borders remained closed to her state.
She based her statement on the Federal Government's definition of a hotspot, which counts the number of cases in a specific geographical area over a three-day period.
"So, if there's no place in Australia that's deemed a hotspot, why do we even have these border closures and restrictions ... it doesn't make sense to me, I don't think it makes sense to the public who have to deal with this frustration," she said.
But when it comes to how states decide who to let in, things get much more complicated — here's why some have decided to shut their borders despite
NSW recording three consecutive days with no locally acquired COVID-19 infections.
When it comes to how states decide who to let in, things get complicated. Here's why some have decided to shut their borders to NSW despite the state recording three consecutive days with no locally acquired COVID-19 infections.
www.abc.net.au