- Joined
- Nov 12, 2012
- Posts
- 27,986
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Virgin
- Platinum
- Star Alliance
- Silver
The logic is unsound. Person A may pass it to Person B on the street but we don't know how many people Person A did not pass it to. They may have been really close and intimate to Person C without passing it on.
The only way meaningful figures can be derived is with large numbers or very controlled experimentation where every possible variable has been eliminated. Otherwise it's the same as saying I flipped a coin ten times today and got eight heads, therefore flipping a coin has an 80% chance of heads.
Exactly. Its much more effective for compliant public control to say "Shock horror! A fleeting contact, caught covid. Its a beast! Its a beast!" rather than, say, "Of 150 people they brushed past, and 30 other close contacts they had, one brush-past person caught covid and we can't be sure of that other vectors weren't in play for that person".
Alarmism for public control is all very well, but sooner or later (perhaps even now), crying wolf becomes counter productive.