Thanks I'll give it a shot
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
I've seem to recall on this thread that it is possible to book 4 seats in J on TG, by booking 2 seats and then waiting for release of another 2 seats later on. Is this correct and does TG do this on Aus-BKK legs (particularly PER)? Appreciate if anyone can shed light on this....
You can still book J flights to Europe for next year.
These routes are still available. You can get J seats Mel- bkk - FCO, ZRH, ARN, CPH & DME. 85K
Obviously some selective routes have been blocked.
With which airline joffaa?
You can still book J flights to Europe for next year.
These routes are still available. You can get J seats Mel- bkk - FCO, ZRH, ARN, CPH & DME. 85K
Obviously some selective routes have been blocked.
Unfortunately all these destinations feature their old angled lie-flat. Of course still better than any Y.
But I thought some people already had some luck by simply contacting LM and had booking done successfully? Plus you can still see flights available separately, so I don't think LM is actively blocking them like they do with LH F class.
unless you could get the full flat beds on select 77W services to ARN/CPH.
I don't believe it's 'select'. Scandinavian services (CPH, ARN, OSL) are pretty much exclusively 77W operated, with the possible exception of occasional substitution where non stop seasonal flights to HKT are operated.
Is it? Seatguru still saying it's operated by 773 or 340. But I know seatguru can be outdated.
Is it? Seatguru still saying it's operated by 773 or 340. But I know seatguru can be outdated.
seat guru is notoriously unreliable for just about anything except USA carriers.
it it would be better to rely on the airline's own website than seat guru.
Sorry Just got lazy.
But for BNE to BKK, TG website states it's 773 with old angled lie-flat in 2-3-2, yet seatguru says its 77W with staggered seat. AFAIK, seatguru is correct on this one! So even TG website can be unrealiable.
I think we've been through this before recently, but TG does not ever list 777-300ER on their website. 777-300 is their coding for 77W, so in that sense, the TG website is correct. If TG plans an old 777-300 they list it as 777-200/300 on the website.
Other airlines use internal coding for planes that don't fit the norm...Asiana springs to mind...77L? (but not referring to a 777-200LR).