FYI QC Bronze can not pre-allocate seats (well at least I can not, even when the system was working)
This feature was only available for PS and above.
FYI QC Bronze can not pre-allocate seats (well at least I can not, even when the system was working)
is this still down for everyone else?
Qantas Advance Seat Selection - UPDATED 28 May 2009
Due to a technical issue that was experienced in the release of Advance Seat Selection, the service has been temporarily suspended until the technical issue is rectified.
Domestic online check-in is not affected and is still available to passengers checking in online up to 24 hours before their flight.
Travel Agents will continue to view seat maps in the same format and there are no changes to existing handling processes for seat requests via QIC or Telesales.
Further information on the reintroduction of Advance Seat Selections will be communicated as soon as possible.
I don't think it was closed down specifically because of exit row seats. The feature looks like it was opened up for some sort of Beta testing, a bit like Windows 7 for example.
After a few days of stress testing the system they would have gathered a whole heap of data/bugs/logs/etc, so it's now closed down for redevelopement.
Any sort of system where someone is rewarded for booking early over status is in my opinion totally wrong.I don't think so, the site was up for only a day (if that), so something must have been clearly wrong.
Any sort of system where someone is rewarded for booking early over status is in my opinion totally wrong.
Any sort of system where someone is rewarded for booking early over status is in my opinion totally wrong.
Agreed and this is my fear with what this new system will turn out like.
So you have never like the Qantas international allocation system employed for the past several years?Any sort of system where someone is rewarded for booking early over status is in my opinion totally wrong.
The business rules proposed for now appear to be wrong. We cannot guess how many of each status are going to be any given flight and as a Platinum I do not want to take a risk of sitting in a middle seat or row 17 on a 737 or row 42 on a 767.In the end, I think it will be more about the business rules that are put in place around seat selection, rather than opening it up that will be the deciding factor.
It appears to be working quite well so I am against change in that respect. Also the two systems appear to be totally different and work independently of one another.So you have never like the Qantas international allocation system employed for the past several years?
The business rules proposed for now appear to be wrong. We cannot guess how many of each status are going to be any given flight and as a Platinum I do not want to take a risk of sitting in a middle seat or row 17 on a 737 or row 42 on a 767.
The current system of allocating seats at T-25 hours appears to be working quite well and even though I do not exactly agree with it at times as a Platinum I am generally in the firtst few rows of WHY. By introducing the new system all you are doing is helping out Silver, possibly Qantas Club members, and to a lesser extent Golds and their entourage get a better seat. Why?
And no I do not believe a Platinum should be paying extra for exit row and I won't be paying extra for exit row....
I'm curious as to why people on these boards feel so threatened by Silver members sitting up near the front
You mean their employer paying for K and Y class airfares. At least I pay for my own airfares, not tax deductible, and I am Platinum and I get to sit in 4C with 4AB vacant. Why would I want a Silver, Gold who's employer does not know any better and pays for flexible airfares get better seats than me?I'm sure that people paying for K and Y class fares - at $300 for a oneway SYD-BNE (or vv) would like to be up the front to.
Your contention is that you, flying the cheapest possible fare, should have seating priority over those that make QF the most profit (for example).
It is my opinion and I will continue to post it. Please stop insulting me and stay away from my posts. This is the last time I reply to anything you post....Please go fly someone else - that will be a win for you, a win for QF and a win for everyone else here. No one loses out. This continual posting of the same objections over and over again is becoming tiresome.
As a SG would I be wanting the 3rd row of economy which is clearly full, knowing Row 1/2 is full of WPs, or would I choose for Row 66 or 67 which the seat maps reveal is absolutely empty?
It does not matter who pays for your airfares ...You mean their employer paying for K and Y class airfares. At least I pay for my own airfares ...
OT: I tried to give you advice on how you could ensure such travel would be quite legally tax deductible as well as applicable for input tax credits - your choice.... At least I pay for my own airfares, not tax deductible ...
So you have never liked the Qantas international allocation system employed for the past several years?Any sort of system where someone is rewarded for booking early over status is in my opinion totally wrong.
My response was specifically in relation to your quote: "Any sort of system where someone is rewarded for booking early over status is in my opinion totally wrong.".... It appears to be working quite well so I am against change in that respect. Also the two systems appear to be totally different and work independently of one another.
Not sure exactly how the old system worked but I had decent seat allocations before asking for complimentary exit rows. Now Qantas is discussing keeping the first row of WHY for Platinum and the 2nd row for Golds while the rest of the rows are available for Silver and above. I cannot see how this is going to keep me in the first few rows of WHY booking late if I cannot get complimentary exit row. And no I do not believe a Platinum should be paying extra for exit row and I won't be paying extra for exit row....
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements