Why am I not surprised by that?FWIW, on the various crew forums, there are dozens of stories coming forward of this behaviour from him and many instances of him not putting away his equipment for landing.
Why am I not surprised by that?FWIW, on the various crew forums, there are dozens of stories coming forward of this behaviour from him and many instances of him not putting away his equipment for landing.
Maybe AJ can show some leadership and publicly defend his staff. It is simply unacceptable to play the race card when race is not a factor.
Links to these forums? Would be interested to read the other stories.
If QF doesn’t issue a statement of support (and soon) for the cabin crew, they need their heads read.I agree. Qantas management just WaP in not coming out strongly in support, given what the cabin crew are going through. AJ? Why yes, given his record on 'speaking out' on issues he think are important.
Why Qantas hasn't banned the jerk is beyond me. Afraid of bad publicity?
If they are 'crew forums', i doubt you'd be able to access.
Screenshots?
I like your ethics.They are private groups for a reason, and a place for crew to talk in confidence so I won't be taking screenshots.
What a coincidence.Interesting to note that The V's have since deleted their twitter account after their post about it being the same flight attendant and supporting will.i.am
If QF doesn’t issue a statement of support (and soon) for the cabin crew, they need their heads read.
… and those two Vs may have a lot to answer for as well.I'd be happy to kick in a few $$s to help the case against will.I.wish.I.was also - maybe crowd funding huh?
As well as support and a request to will.i.am to cease and desist, Qantas is willing to help the FA sue for defamation
...Qantas offers to help cabin crew sue will.i.am over racism claim
Qantas says it is willing to help one of its cabin crew members take defamation action against pop star will.i.am if he does not retract his claim she racially discriminated against him.www.smh.com.au
Wouldn't an ethical barrister advise that there'd only be a limited chance of success, bearing in mind that at least two passengers 'tweeted' in support of the hip-hop gent long before anyone came out in support of the female CSM?
I hope QF PR department hasn't contacted passengers and offered them an incentive such as FF points to claim it wasn't as the Black Eyed Peas gent suggested. Don't put it past them!
What a disgusting comment.
Says a lot about the op.
As I have said before i do follow twitter-not normally this type of garbage but I have a look when it comes up on AFF.Wouldn't an ethical barrister advise that there'd only be a limited chance of success, bearing in mind that at least two passengers 'tweeted' in support of the hip-hop gent long before anyone came out in support of the female CSM?
Irrespective as to what one thinks of Maurice Blackburn as a law firm, of the two legal eagles quoted, its representative gives by far the preferable - and realistic - quote.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Wouldn't an ethical barrister advise that there'd only be a limited chance of success, bearing in mind that at least two passengers 'tweeted' in support of the hip-hop gent long before anyone came out in support of the female CSM?
If engaged, they would be advising their client, not making public announcements.