Marginal awards! What a load of equine excrement. ASA that I've searched, while having the same base points cost (or lower) as classic awards have always involved a higher cash payment than classic awards. How the hell can they describe something that gets more cash or more point - marginal?
Via normal numbers
Absolutely.Wouldn't it be easier to stop sending DSC letters out to reduce the elites
So we just need to adjust our thinking as we have done with every enhancement.Below is a slide showing most of the changes, what is not covered in that slide:
1. "Marginal Redemptions" are only available by phone for both availability checks and booking, these are the cheaper seats that have a small cost to be reduced to classic award level.
2. "Marginal Redemptions" are not included as their future is currently under review.
3. The cost formulas for point conversions, so the value in using cash vs points is still there.
View attachment 16696
Thank you to Red Roo and the team for the briefing yesterday, the engagement with AFF is as always most appreciated.
My key takeaway, the best value is not yet gone, (but will be going I suspect), and is now harder to get, get them while you can!
Dedicated desk accessed via general phone number I assume...
So we just need to adjust our thinking as we have done with every enhancement.
Almost choked when he used the term "marginal ASA". Retention of my QF Gold might also be marginal
[h=2]Lorum Ipsum[/h] Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Nam cursus. Morbi ut mi.
So much for not getting rid of ASA's.
I wonder what AFF members who asked directly various people in QF about ASA's now think about their honesty?
Had a look at the site and trying to look up redemption's and it sent to page with something in another language.
[h=2]What is Lorem Ipsum? Fake Latin[/h][h=3]Using place holder content in your design work[/h]When design agencies present their work to a client, often times the agency choses to swap out readable text for placeholder text in fake latin. The idea is to not influence the client's reaction or permit the client to get caught up in reading the text, in favor of discussing the design elements. The following text is an example of such fake latin text uses in design comps.
I'd say it mostly has to do with the fact that you earn points back, thereby decreasing the overall gain from QFFs point of view. That is not to forget status credits either. I am sure QF place a notional value on SC - if not on an SC itself, then how much revenue (remembering points do have a value to QF) an average member should bring in to achieve PS, SG, WP and WP1. If xASA distort this too much then I understand why, from a business perspective, they are considering their removal (and making them as hard as possible to actually use).
However perhaps this is just an easier way to bring down the number of elites in the system (in various tiers) to compensate for the no doubt many moving up the ladder through DSC without using xASA fares. This is speculation though as I obviously don't know how many xASA fares actually get purchased at these so called "marginal" levels.
So much for not getting rid of ASA's.
I wonder what AFF members who asked directly various people in QF about ASA's now think about their honesty?
Had a look at the site and trying to look up redemption's and it sent to page with something in another language.
Lorum Ipsum is placeholder text in the publishing world, ie Rubbish to retain format.
So much for not getting rid of ASA's.
I wonder what AFF members who asked directly various people in QF about ASA's now think about their honesty?
Had a look at the site and trying to look up redemption's and it sent to page with something in another language.
With the launch of the new website set for 08 April QF will no longer offer Any Seat Awards - it will simply being the points+pay option. The new site will offer commercial seats and award seats on the same search page. So I guess this is the end of cheap FASA/JASA which share the same revenue class as the classic awards. It was good while it lasted.
My main objection is the idea there are marginal awards. If we go down that path for asa at classic levels then surely we soon get to classic awards being marginal. It's easy enough to adjust the points requirement to compensate for the earning. I've always maintained that awards (all awards) should earn SC but not points, to recognise loyalty and the value QFF gain from the award.
No good. I find this quite annoying as well...sorry for o/t modsAnyway maybe I'm just upset because the hotel thought the daily telegraph is a suitable alternative to The Oz or SMH or even AFR.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Red Roo what imbecile designed this new QFF incarnation, its time consuming, awkward to navigate, stupid and ridiculous.
I for one will now have to rethink my long allegiance to QFF.