PineappleSkip
Established Member
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
- Posts
- 3,270
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Virgin
- Red
Just been reading the OECD interim economic outlook released today (the OECD coronavirus report, if you will). The full report is only 18 pages and pretty readable (if you like economics). If you like pictures, the cover photo is of an empty airport baggage hall. (where is that??)
Much of the report and its numbers is based on a lot of modelling work that draws on what the report refers to as a "base case" scenario, described as a "temporary blow", with a severe, short-lived downturn in China, and growth in Japan, Korea, and Australia, growth also hit hard, but temporarily. This is based on the spread being largely limited to China...
However, as we all know, there is now rapid global spread of the virus, with reported case numbers outside China set to exceed 10,000 tonight . Consequently, the OECD report also describes a "domino scenario" of broader contagion, with the intensity of the China impact repeated in northern advanced economies, severely hitting confidence, travel, and spending, and a gradual recovery through 2021 preducted (with a lot of uncertainty around that).
This China intensity hasn't materialised yet although the case growth numbers outside China, doubling every 5 days, make this scenario increasingly likely. In fact the headline rate of growth has accelerated in recent days. (Non China case numbers reached 1,000 on Feb 16, 2,000 on Feb 23, 4,000 on Feb 27, and 8,000 on March 1). Of course, we know that Malthusian growth doesn't last forever, countries will try and limit its growth, and eventually it will be self limiting. We just don't know when.
So for me the interesting stuff is toward the end about the domino scenario. It predicts economic impacts similar to those seen in China
Fear not, there is no prediction that the sky will fall. However, it is likely to lower somewhat, possibly for an extended period. Looking forward to unconventional policy measures, which sound like rabbits extracted from hats.
Cheers skip
Much of the report and its numbers is based on a lot of modelling work that draws on what the report refers to as a "base case" scenario, described as a "temporary blow", with a severe, short-lived downturn in China, and growth in Japan, Korea, and Australia, growth also hit hard, but temporarily. This is based on the spread being largely limited to China...
The projections are based on the assumption that the epidemic peaks in China in the first quarter of 2020, with a gradual recovery through the second quarter aided by significant domestic policy easing.
However, as we all know, there is now rapid global spread of the virus, with reported case numbers outside China set to exceed 10,000 tonight . Consequently, the OECD report also describes a "domino scenario" of broader contagion, with the intensity of the China impact repeated in northern advanced economies, severely hitting confidence, travel, and spending, and a gradual recovery through 2021 preducted (with a lot of uncertainty around that).
This China intensity hasn't materialised yet although the case growth numbers outside China, doubling every 5 days, make this scenario increasingly likely. In fact the headline rate of growth has accelerated in recent days. (Non China case numbers reached 1,000 on Feb 16, 2,000 on Feb 23, 4,000 on Feb 27, and 8,000 on March 1). Of course, we know that Malthusian growth doesn't last forever, countries will try and limit its growth, and eventually it will be self limiting. We just don't know when.
So for me the interesting stuff is toward the end about the domino scenario. It predicts economic impacts similar to those seen in China
The shocks modelled in this scenario include a 2% hit to domestic demand in Q2 and Q3, and a 20% reduction in global equity prices in the first nine months, with results ...... with a significant hit to confidence, heighted uncertainty and (voluntary) restraints on travel and commercial and sporting events all likely to depress spending
It also offers this commentary for the RBA and other central banks to considerInitially, the adverse impact is concentrated in China, but the effects in the rest of Asia, Europe and North America gradually build up through 2020. The major part of the decline in GDP again stems from the direct effects of the reduction in demand, but the impact of heightened uncertainty accumulates gradually, ... deflationary effects of the combined shocks [that] are considerably larger than in the base-case scenario
Faced with a large negative shock of the magnitude considered, and an extended period of high uncertainty, there would be a rising chance that several central banks could become constrained by the zero lower bound on policy interest rates, including those in Australia, Korea and the United Kingdom. Unconventional policy measures would then be needed to make policy more accommodative.
Fear not, there is no prediction that the sky will fall. However, it is likely to lower somewhat, possibly for an extended period. Looking forward to unconventional policy measures, which sound like rabbits extracted from hats.
Cheers skip