Experience with Australian border controls leaving the country

I dunno - maybe there is more to this than is reported - but it does seem heavy handed and unfair :(



Now approved to travel

 
So many years of watching too many US movies and TV shows has many Australians confused thinking they somehow have "rights" enshrined in law. There is no bill of rights, no second amendment and all that stuff we hear nightly with an American accent.

In AU we have a complex interleaved series of laws and declarations that produce the fabric of our border controls both from a customs and immigration/emigration perspective.

While there are underlying published "right to freedom of movement" principles, governments may at any time pass laws and directives to vary those underlying principles.


The fed gov has and does not infrequently pass laws that limit movement.

Examples include under terrorist legislation defining countries you may not travel to without permission, the ATO and Centrelink can forbid you leaving if you have a debt, the family court can forbid you and/or your kids from leaving, any court can seize your passport or issue orders to prevent you leaving if you are suspected of committing a crime. Child trafficking. Suspected human slavery. Bio-security. Pandemics. There are heaps of examples.
 
You would probably be surprised then to learn before covid it would happen in an airport in Australia on almost a daily basis.

There is a massive difference between stopping an individual when the relevant authorities have grounds and stopping the movement of every innocent citizen.
 
And although the Government can pass a law against visiting Syria and have indeed arrested people for trying to do so many have still gone to Syria whilst that law was in place.

On a different note we have been able to get a Kiwi back to Tasmania.unfortynately his father died 12 hours before his arrival.

and to day a woman and her 2 young children are on their way to Tasmania for the same reason.Of course no WA flights connect to the LST service so they will arrive tomorrow sadly almost certainly being too late.

Though in both cases able to be here for the funeral.
 
Ok, so after applying again for an exemption, we have finally been granted on to leave the country. I attached:
- Flight tickets
- Rental contract (official naati translation) overseas
- Quote and working order from the movers
- Passports (dual citizens)
- Marriage & Birth certificates

Processing time: 1.5 weeks. Departure date: 21st of May.

My advice if someone needs to plan ahead, book a refundable (or flexible to change dates) ticket that's a few days away. Apply, once granted change the tickets to whenever you want to fly. In that way you will have certainty.
 
Ok, so after applying again for an exemption, we have finally been granted on to leave the country. I attached:
- Flight tickets
- Rental contract (official naati translation) overseas
- Quote and working order from the movers
- Passports (dual citizens)
- Marriage & Birth certificates

Processing time: 1.5 weeks. Departure date: 21st of May.

My advice if someone needs to plan ahead, book a refundable (or flexible to change dates) ticket that's a few days away. Apply, once granted change the tickets to whenever you want to fly. In that way you will have certainty.


So it doesn't matter if you do not have the specified flight number on the exemption? It can be a totally different one?
 
The way I understood this, yes. Here what home affairs had to say about it:
"You do not need to re-apply for permission to depart if your flight details change, unless the departure airport changes."
 
The way I understood this, yes. Here what home affairs had to say about it:
"You do not need to re-apply for permission to depart if your flight details change, unless the departure airport changes."

I might be a bit too cautious but I wouldn't recommend anyone to book a flight purely to seek an exemption with the view of changing the flight dates further down the line. I think that clause is in place as they understand flights get cancelled all the time so they don't want people to reapply if the airline moved the flight by a day.

It won't be pleasant arguing with the ABF if they felt you have gamed the system by booking a flight that you have no intention of taking and deny you boarding on the day.
 
I might be a bit too cautious but I wouldn't recommend anyone to book a flight purely to seek an exemption with the view of changing the flight dates further down the line. I think that clause is in place as they understand flights get cancelled all the time so they don't want people to reapply if the airline moved the flight by a day.

It won't be pleasant arguing with the ABF if they felt you have gamed the system by booking a flight that you have no intention of taking and deny you boarding on the day.
I agree on that. However, when asking Home Affairs on how I could speed up the process as I don't want to be in a position where I cancel my lease to move, then find out I get rejected and don't have a home she said I have to wait. She also said I can change my flight once granted approval. When then asking her whether the only choice I have to be sure is to book a flight in 3-4 days, get a confirmation (as they prioritise based on departure date) and then change my flight, she said that is correct. It depends on your risk profile, I guess. But this process that was established is far from perfect and therefore warrants for you to create your own loopholes, in my opinion.
 
Our family had plans to move back to the USA , but we are dual citizens and therefore feel "stuck" in Australia due to the travel ban. We are currently renting a house so we can provide our rental contract ended and we own our house in the USA. We are unable to provide new job contracts in the USA as I do not need to work straight away. We will not be moving anything to the USA.

I think we may not be granted an exemption to leave. Anyone else in a similiar situation and what was the outcome?
 
Our family had plans to move back to the USA , but we are dual citizens and therefore feel "stuck" in Australia due to the travel ban. We are currently renting a house so we can provide our rental contract ended and we own our house in the USA. We are unable to provide new job contracts in the USA as I do not need to work straight away. We will not be moving anything to the USA.

I think we may not be granted an exemption to leave. Anyone else in a similiar situation and what was the outcome?
I am not in a similar situation, but just a suggestion - perhaps if you have any evidence of these prior plans - like any text messages discussing it, or if you can get notarised statements from friends/family that you had discussed this intent, it could help? Providing evidence of everything you state, is the key - so if you don't need to work straight away, that's a reasonable proposition, if you can back it up with a certain balance in your bank account. Think like a lawyer! You will not be moving anything to USA? Then show photographs of your house content in USA which has everything you need. Etc.
 
Davstrev, I thnk you are right, you have a weak case. It’s clear that they are not paying much regard to “I’m gunnna” evdence without some independent corroboration. I think this is pretty compelling.

We will not be moving anything to the USA.

Yeah, but they would want independent evidence that you are moving. You could go to a TA, dummy up a OW booking, and put your claim up based on that, but I would be disinclined to put any money down.

cheers skip
 
Incredible that we’d even be using terms like this for wanting to leave the country! Really scary precedent
Yes. When the Do Not Travel alert went on it never occurred to me that this prevented travel out of the country. I thought you could still travel but at your own risk completely.
 
Yes. When the Do Not Travel alert went on it never occurred to me that this prevented travel out of the country. I thought you could still travel but at your own risk completely.

That's a good question. I'm not sure the two are necessarily related? 'Do not travel' is an advice, issued by smartraveller. You can still travel when the advice is in place, but at your own risk. The ban on travel is separate: the Biosecurity (Human Biosecurity Emergency) (Human Coronavirus with Pandemic Potential) (Overseas Travel Ban Emergency Requirements) Determination 2020 and made under the Biosecurity Act 2015.
 
Turn business expenses into Business Class! Process $10,000 through pay.com.au to score 20,000 bonus PayRewards Points and join 30k+ savvy business owners enjoying these benefits:

- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

That's a good question. I'm not sure the two are necessarily related? 'Do not travel' is an advice, issued by smartraveller. You can still travel when the advice is in place, but at your own risk. The ban on travel is separate: the Biosecurity (Human Biosecurity Emergency) (Human Coronavirus with Pandemic Potential) (Overseas Travel Ban Emergency Requirements) Determination 2020 and made under the Biosecurity Act 2015.
Ah. Thankyou. That explains it.
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top