I must admit that I have not been following them of late.
Reading what is there now, would seem to be a good summary of what I would think most here in Australia would have thought to be the case for a while. Including that fomite transmission is not that common.
Did they not acknowledge airborne transmission at all prior to the 5th?
COVID-19 can sometimes be spread by airborne transmission
- Some infections can be spread by exposure to virus in small droplets and particles that can linger in the air for minutes to hours. These viruses may be able to infect people who are further than 6 feet away from the person who is infected or after that person has left the space.
- This kind of spread is referred to as airborne transmission and is an important way that infections like tuberculosis, measles, and chicken pox are spread.
- There is evidence that under certain conditions, people with COVID-19 seem to have infected others who were more than 6 feet away. These transmissions occurred within enclosed spaces that had inadequate ventilation. Sometimes the infected person was breathing heavily, for example while singing or exercising.
- Under these circumstances, scientists believe that the amount of infectious smaller droplet and particles produced by the people with COVID-19 became concentrated enough to spread the virus to other people. The people who were infected were in the same space during the same time or shortly after the person with COVID-19 had left.
- Available data indicate that it is much more common for the virus that causes COVID-19 to spread through close contact with a person who has COVID-19 than through airborne transmission.
HVAC
However reading what they have on ventilation and HVAC (Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning) it looks ok for home settings, and large facilities but does not seem to highlight that
small premises (whether they be shops, hair dressers, offices) that essentially only have "household" HVAC is probably going to be inadequate in many situations due the lack of air change (ventilation).
This is the same in Australia and is often ignored. I do note that Step 2 in Vic for restaurants focusses on outside dining , with strict limits on inside dining, for this reason. But even those small limits may not be strict enough depending on the premises and I personally would not be confident that many operators will really focus on adequate ventilation.
Now outside of Vic in Australia as infections are now effectively zero it does not really matter (though it does mean those settings remain in theory vunerable), but certainly in Metro Melb in Vic I would not be visiting such premises till cases are virtually zero.