- Joined
- Dec 21, 2012
- Posts
- 5,684
- Qantas
- LT Gold
Ditto Flashback - have a great tripExcellent - sounds as though you are on the mend! Hope all goes well and you have a fabulous holiday!
Ditto Flashback - have a great tripExcellent - sounds as though you are on the mend! Hope all goes well and you have a fabulous holiday!
For medicinal purposes only of courseDamn - that's what I am missing! Better start drinking red wine. :mrgreen:
1.)i assume you regard Mayo clinic as reasonably reputable? They have as a risk factor for side effects for statins as simply being Female. I am a female.
2. Almost no independent research has been done on statins - mainly done by pharmaceutical companies.
3. Trials have mainly centred on males - very little on older women.
4. I am making a judgement call together with my GP on how necessary statins are for me. Given my ratio of good to bad is well under the recommended ratio, I am electing not to use statins. My ratio is 2.9 with the recommended ratio < 4.5.
5. My GP has had at least one case of statins causing congnitive confusion in a female patient which vanished after she was taken off statins. While I agree that doesn't mean every female is going to, I don't choose to take that risk.
Its good to get your perspective here drron.1.the vast majority of Cardiologists at the Mayo believe in and prescribe statins. <snip>
For medicinal purposes only of course
I drink Gin and Tonic to guard against malaria in CBR It's rife here of course.
Not going to argue, as I don't on social media and I am not a professional....1.the vast majority of Cardiologists at the Mayo believe in and prescribe statins.
2.There have been independent trials and the results are the same as "Big Pharma" trials.
3.there are certainly more males studied-hint males have more heart disease-but over 100000 females have been in trials.
4.You are right here.It isn't just total cholesterol that should be taken into account.
5.Extremely rare.But in many it is Total Retrograde Amnesia which despite the opinion of John Glenn is not due to statins.I personally have seen ~ 20 such cases and only 1 was on a statin.It was also reported first more than 400 years ago which is a little before the use of statins.
There are studies that suggest statins may prevent dementia,though other studies don't.Consensus is that probably not useful but not harmful.For further reading here is a list of scientific publications you can read rather than the "pop" science found on the internet-
statins dementia - PubMed - NCBI
6.A new analysis by Oxford University using data from all trials comes out on the side of statins.
7.None of this means I think you should be on a statin as I have no knowledge of your medical history.
I never said they didn't - what I said is that they list risk factors for side effects from statins and no 2 was being female. No 4 was 65 and older. OK that's it - no more from me1.the vast majority of Cardiologists at the Mayo believe in and prescribe statins.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
I hope I'm not (well I'm not 70 - a few years yet)On a slightly lighter note......
The interesting thing that came out of this is that I was advised that starting shortly this jab will become free for 70s and over. As a few here are older than me I thought this may be of interest to you.
Roger hoping all goes well tomorrow.
Thanks Drron
The onco had previously stated that if there was an increase in size or number of the pulmonary nodules, then chemotherapy would need to be undertaken. The options he oulined are:
1. Sunitinib (available in CBR):
or
2. a clinical trial (Checkmate 214), in which 50% of patients receive Sunitinib and 50% receive a newer drug, Nivolumab, which is approved for use in the USA, but not yet here.
However patients won't know which drug they are getting (unless they have read the factsheet, which says the Sunitinib is administered in tablet form, whereas the Nivolumab is via IV. I would assume that the drugs are provided FOC by the trial operators.
Drawbacks of the trial are that it has been operating for a while and they aren't recruiting ATM, although they may be open to persuasion by the onco. Its also in Sydney at Westmead with travel for me from CBR and there is no guarantee which drug one would have administered.
Methinks I will take the CBR option with the 9 year old drug.
Appreciate any thoughts on this.
On a slightly lighter note.
I went and had a Shingles jab today. At $208 (minus $100 health fund rebate) I decided the cost was worth it when compared to what catching the disease potentially offers.
The interesting thing that came out of this is that I was advised that starting shortly this jab will become free for 70s and over. As a few here are older than me I thought this may be of interest to you.
what age do they stop giving it?Yeah I plan to take mum into the GP in November for the free Shingles jab. Interestingly my Dad can't get it because he is too old!
Mum suffered a bout of Shingles after having colon tumours removed.
what age do they stop giving it?
But the chance of side effects in a woman older than 65 are still a lot less than the chance of benefit.I never said they didn't - what I said is that they list risk factors for side effects from statins and no 2 was being female. No 4 was 65 and older. OK that's it - no more from me