medhead
Suspended
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2008
- Posts
- 19,074
How about " that was really good but" ...... But what?!!
It was still cough, or
I'm not doing it again
How about " that was really good but" ...... But what?!!
How about " that was really good but" ...... But what?!!
How about " that was really good but" ...... But what?!!
Ending a sentence in 'but' seems to be peculiar to WA. When I was at school there it was widespread. I came from South Australia when 'though' was routinely added to the end of sentences.
Yeah, nah, but...
I usually hear the triple:
Yeah, but nah, but yeah
which is the opposite of
Nah, but yeah, but nah
.... but could have been better?How about " that was really good but" ...... But what?!!
I've heard that being used before, usually in the context that the but should actually be placed at the beginning of the sentence. For example:
"I heard that Max is hungover big time this morning."
"Yeah, we were doing shots last night. I think he'll be out for the whole morning. Really good last night, but."
I usually hear the triple:
Yeah, but nah, but yeah
which is the opposite of
Nah, but yeah, but nah
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
You may be thinking about "different to". "Different from" is always the correct form."Than" is used for rank order comparatives: you have two objects and you are measuring them and placing them into an order. If you reverse the order, you invert the meaning:
"Alice is taller than Bob"
"Bob is taller than Alice"
"Brighton is closer than Paris"
"Paris is closer than Brighton"
"Different than" makes no sense because the order of arguments is irrelevant, unless you are using e.g. "more different than", e.g. "Paris and London are more different than Brighton and London are", i.e. where (again) you are using 'than' for the purposes of a rank order comparison.
"Different than" manages to sound both lazy and awkward at the same time. It sounds like something a hillbilly would say, yet it's become the dominant form in North America over the course of the last 30-40 years for some reason. (You barely hear it or read it earlier than that.)
I couldn't resist posting this comment I read where the poster was having a go at the columnist for using the 'abomination' (his word) "different than" instead of "different from".
The poster seemed to be Indian, by the way. "Different than" is almost universal in the US of A and is creeping in here.
"Different than" is plain ugly...I wouldn't call it an abomination but the poster is right, it just doesn't make sense
"home Made" so it's "Craft"?
"home Made" so it's "Craft"?
I always proof-read my labels after I print them...
Double faultIt was on the menu. I think they meant "Carafe".
Dabbling in the differences between a LOTE and English again, I've realised that the following two sentences mean the same thing:
I have a hammer.
I've got a hammer.
The second one would seem to have a superfluous verb in it. If someone asked the question, "Who has a hammer?" both responses would seem fine.
Is there a semantic difference here I'm missing or are they semantically the same, maybe the second one is clumsy and tends to be more in spoken English more than written?
What about 'why' vs "how come"?
"How come" appears to mean the same as 'why' but I don't know if you hear it so much these days. It sounds a bit rustic though.
"How come you didn't come to the pub?" vs
"Why didn't you come to the pub?"
It actually sounds a bit less interrogative now I think about it.