Grammar Discussions

Not so sure about that. Ever decided to "have a think" about something? Then made a pronouncement based on that thought, only to have someone suggest you got it wrong, and would need to go back and have "another think" about it? Hence you would have "another think" - about that particular subject - coming. ;)
You are not sure that it sounds odd to me? :confused: I can assure you that it does. :)

I accept the rationale behind it, it is the pronunciation that will take some time for my ears to adjust to.
 
I have read threads on this elsewhere and it appears to be have geographic variances with mid-west US contributors expressing "thing" as normal to their region for instance. My late mother, a grammar naz_ born early last century always said "thing" so that is what I use.
Judas Priest and Pat Boon certainly think thing is the way to go;
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biXnwOMznkg
- https://www.google.com.au/?client=f...PS45NzSotLUous8ksyUosUylKLijPz84oBi4Ik0ksAAAA

I expect you say filum as well? ;)
 
I posted this on my trip report but it's relevant here too.

This is the sign by the lifts at the hotel at which I am currently staying. God, I hope that sentence is grammatically correct :oops:.
Lift Sign.jpg

This would suggest that you should never use the elevator in case there is a fire. I think it should read "In the event of a fire, do not use the elevator".
 
I have no idea if "think" is correct or not gramamatically speaking, but I can see from whence tuapekastat is coming considering the context in which the word is used:

Let's for a moment imaging that I think the sky is red. However, I'm open to believing it is a different colour.

Let's further imagine that you tell me the sky is blue.

If I actively consider that the sky may be blue, it can be said I'm rethinking the colour of the sky.

So might you then say of me, "If he thinks the sky is red, he has another think coming."?
 
Australia's highest-earning Velocity Frequent Flyer credit card:
- Earn 60,000 bonus Velocity Points
- Get unlimited Virgin Australia Lounge access
- Enjoy a complimentary return Virgin Australia domestic flight each year

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

This morning I heard a radio personality say pentathalon.

edit: Just now on Channel 7, sports reporter Ryan Phelan mispronounced the same sport...and he is reading it off a teleprompter! With Ch7 the official Olympic channel you'd think they would have covered these silly errors in a pre-games briefing for reporters.
 
Last edited:
This morning I heard a radio personality say pentathalon.

edit: Just now on Channel 7, sports reporter Ryan Phelan mispronounced the same sport...and he is reading it off a teleprompter! With Ch7 the official Olympic channel you'd think they would have covered these silly errors in a pre-games briefing for reporters.

And wouldn't you know it? Ditto for Ch 9 reporter (not sure which one) just now AND the Ch 7 commentator calling it. Sigh.
 
And wouldn't you know it? Ditto for Ch 9 reporter (not sure which one) just now AND the Ch 7 commentator calling it. Sigh.
Now if someone could educate them on the difference between adjectives and adverbs it maybe possible to listen to a sports commentator without screaming at the radio/tv.
 
I posted this on my trip report but it's relevant here too.

This is the sign by the lifts at the hotel at which I am currently staying. God, I hope that sentence is grammatically correct :oops:.
View attachment 77209

This would suggest that you should never use the elevator in case there is a fire. I think it should read "In the event of a fire, do not use the elevator".

What’s more to the point is “elevator” should be replaced with “lift”.

It would be a rare situation where if there was a fire you would want to go up and not down.

 
What’s more to the point is “elevator” should be replaced with “lift”.

It would be a rare situation where if there was a fire you would want to go up and not down.


Not sure about that. Wouldn't you generally lift something up rather than down? So both are probably wrong.
 
Last edited:
What’s more to the point is “elevator” should be replaced with “lift”.

It would be a rare situation where if there was a fire you would want to go up and not down.


Not sure about that. Wouldn't you generally lift something up rather than down? So both are probably wrong.


Sounds like we should escalate the question. :mrgreen:
 
As an aside I never cease to be amazed at the stupid-human behaviour I see at the baggage claim area. :rolleyes:
 
What’s more to the point is “elevator” should be replaced with “lift”.

It would be a rare situation where if there was a fire you would want to go up and not down.


At Crowne Plaza Auckland Airport some years ago and asked how to get to room. The receptionist said "go down the corridor then take the lift". When the fellow bringing our luggage and we got to the end of the corridor there was a set of steps on the left. I said to him "where's the lift?" and he said "we don't have an elevator, Sir". Sigh...
 
I was about to write "at the baggage carousel" but changed it. If I were to ask you where you saw the Iron Maiden perform (probably The Veronicas?) would you tell me that it was "in" the Brisbane Entertainment Centre or "at" the Brisbane Entertainment Centre? ;)
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top