Grammar Discussions

some would say that people who look to correct poor grammar and spelling need to get over it. (contributors to this thread excluded)
AFF is generally good.

Reading comments on stories on Ninemsn and Sydney Morning Herald and what I read looks like English but I can hardly understand the words/sentences. Very poor.

I would say thry need to learn English before I need to get over it.
 
A while ago now, but I once heard a radio presenter in the UK reference "the scimitar oryx with its rapier-like horns".
 
AFF is generally good.

Reading comments on stories on Ninemsn and Sydney Morning Herald and what I read looks like English but I can hardly understand the words/sentences. Very poor.

I would say thry need to learn English before I need to get over it.

Here is one from the ABC News 24 website about the FOI challenge to Brandis' diary:

[FONT=&quot]You can imagine a Minister of the Crown would be a busy person. Managing their diary could be an onerous task.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Australian Broadcasting Commission Tuesday 6[SUP]th[/SUP] September 2016[/FONT]
 
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

On ABC New Radio, announcers referred to certain English football matches this weekend as derby as well as darby.
 
On ABC New Radio, announcers referred to certain English football matches this weekend as derby as well as darby.

If you were following American pronunciation, you could have a Midland "derby" between "Darby" County and Nottingham Forest
 
What really gets me is the oft quoted:

"new initiative"

Some redundancy here!

I think the reason this is done is because people come up with "initiatives" all the time (not necessarily fantastic ones, but nonetheless). The word "new" was supposed to reconfirm, albeit redundantly, to people that whatever "initiative" that was brought up before is not the one they are talking about right now.

Saying something like "current initiative" doesn't quite have the same power, even if it would be grammatically correct and accurate.
 
I think the reason this is done is because people come up with "initiatives" all the time (not necessarily fantastic ones, but nonetheless). The word "new" was supposed to reconfirm, albeit redundantly, to people that whatever "initiative" that was brought up before is not the one they are talking about right now.

Saying something like "current initiative" doesn't quite have the same power, even if it would be grammatically correct and accurate.


The definition of initiative is: an introductory act or step. If this is the case, then usunf "new" with initiative is indeed redundant - as in a "new introductory act or step".
 
The definition of initiative is: an introductory act or step. If this is the case, then usunf "new" with initiative is indeed redundant - as in a "new introductory act or step".

What if someone is discussing within the context of a number of introductory acts or steps over a period of time?

As well, there are additional definitions for "initiative" which do not necessarily make it outright wrong to say "new initiative":

dictionary.com said:
one's personal, responsible decision.

---

Government.
a procedure by which a specified number of voters may propose a statute, constitutional amendment, or ordinance, and compel a popular vote on its adoption. Compare referendum.

the general right or ability to present a new bill or measure, as in a legislature.
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top