whatmeworry
Established Member
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2007
- Posts
- 4,623
Paranoid spell checking.
English grammar is extremely complex.I had a quick flick through and it seemed to be complex grammar.
I"caution, isle parking zone". Excuse me while I just park my island over here....
Some people are attempting bring English back to its Germanic roots with a language called Anglish.
[video=youtube;IIo-17SIkws]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIo-17SIkws[/video]
Some people are attempting to bring English back to its Germanic roots with a language called Anglish.
...
EARTH will be decimated in a nightmarish inferno as the sun balloons to 100 times its normal size, scientists predict.
Confusion abounds: Scrap versus scrape. The forms are:Sample sentences:
- Gerund form: scrapping; scraping
- Past tense: scrapped; scraped
- The airline has decided to scrap the service between Brisbane and Tahiti.
- I wish they would scrape the chilli jam off my burger.
No? Where's the confusion. Completely different meaning.
Sorry, should have explained the context better.
It's a small PSA / rant after I found several examples online where the two words were used incorrectly, particularly in non-infinitive forms, e.g. "scraped a service", "chilli jam scrapped off" (the latter one might make sense with some rather esoteric interpretation).
Yes. Is that more just a comment on the poor spellink ability of the user? (Or on the use of auto-correct dictionaries!)
Not sure if it's Qantas' error or David Flynn's error in the AusBT article on the PER-LHR using 787-9s:
Quote "For its part, Qantas has made an "in-principal agreement".
Surely it's "in-principle".
Aside from the honest tragedy of the event, the ABC ran the following Breaking News text on the runner:
"Twelve people dead after truck drove into Christmas markets" (or similar)
My dad thought the ABC must have a bunch of grammar muppets at work because he said it should read, "...after a truck was driven into..." That is, trucks don't drive themselves, they have to be driven. He makes a similar argument when a line like, "Two in hospital after a car and lamp post collided," again claiming this is BS as it is the car which has collided with the lamp post, and not the latter which has contributed to the two objects colliding.
What do you think?
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
having a disagreement with the marketing team here and thought let me ask the Grammar Buffs
xx_, world's ahead
where xx_ is the product name, I don't agree with the ' in "world's" but English is only my third language so I could be mistaken