Pushka
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2011
- Posts
- 29,111
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Virgin
- Red
That’s gunna get you into a lot of trouble! (And I love it and totally agree with it!)
That’s gunna get you into a lot of trouble! (And I love it and totally agree with it!)
Of course not. But I'm not sure this is much better:
View attachment 190577
In spite of what you heard in New York, the world is not ending.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
And here it is explained just where the extremist view of climate change has come from and why it is terribly wrong.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogerp...-used-to-generate-climate-cough/#5a49adf14af0
That was completely untrue.Please read the link in Post 82.It is written by an acknowledged climate scientist using evidence from IPCC Scientific reports.
The doomsday scenario is totally false.
So you left out a bit about Roger Pielke's academic history-
From 1971 to 1974 he worked as a research scientist at the NOAA Experimental Meteorology Lab (EML), from 1974 to 1981 he was an associate professor at the University of Virginia (UVa), served the primary academic position of his career as a professor at Colorado State University (CSU) from 1981 to 2006, was deputy of Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere (CIRA) at Colorado State University from 1985 to 1988, from 1999 to 2006 was Colorado State Climatologist, at Duke University was a research professor from 2003 to 2006, and was a visiting professor at the University of Arizona from October–December 2004. Since 2005, Pielke has served as Senior Research Scientist at the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES) at CU-Boulder and an emeritus professor of the Department of Atmospheric Science at CSU. After retiring from CSU and he remains a CIRES emeritus researcher.
I think that makes him a climate scientist.
So I am perpetually puzzled as to why climate change has turned into a war between the right wing and science. The planet is a very complex machine and modelling is as complex as brain surgery, but how does this becomes a reason to trust the expertise of Alan Jones, Andrew Bolt, Miranda Devine over the thousands of climate scientists? I mean you would have to be on some kind of special spectrum to make that call.
I don’t think Tim Flannery is a climate scientist either - mainly a geologist, and palaeontologist. Also into mammalian evolution. But climate scientist - nope. As are a lot of the IPCC “scientist”
This simple fact forces me to look back on my 20 years of climate activism as a colossal failure.
It’s taken on the dogma of religion.
BTW did Greta fly back?
It’s taken on the dogma of religion
Though Roger Pielke SENIOR retweeted Juniors tweet re his article.Senior endorses this article.No, that is Roger Pielke SENIOR.
He is the FATHER of the author of that article.