kangarooflyer88
Established Member
- Joined
- May 29, 2021
- Posts
- 4,068
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Virgin
- Silver
- Oneworld
- Emerald
- SkyTeam
- Elite Plus
- Star Alliance
- Gold
Indeed it is! However, what for the SYD domestic lounges is everything else was equal. Sure you could argue that the SYD DOM J lounge has a slightly more expensive bottle of plonk but that's about it. So with all else equal, I would concede that if the only difference is views of apron, then yeah that would be the deciding factor. However comparing SYD INT J versus MEL INT J all else isn't equal with the MEL lounge having the better catering IMHO.Is this the same poster that has criticised the SYD dom J lounge for having poor/worse apron views than the QC or other locations in the terminal? I am unsure how to reconcile this.
Technically you can access those lounges holding elite status with airlines when travelling internationally with them.The Aadmirals Lounges, United Club and Delta equivalent are generally paid membership lounges. Along with some non-US-based status holders.
Keep in mind though that those dedicated International Business class lounges cater for people actually travelling internationally (i.e. on an intercontinental trip), they aren't for Maple Syrup runs. That being said you are absolutely correct those are a step above QF J lounges, and perhaps even Flounges. In particular I am reminded of the sit down dining experience at the Polaris lounge at O'Hare:AA’s Flagship lounges and United Polaris lounges are the comparisons. They cater for business class pax. It’s true some airports don’t have Flagship or Polaris lounges yet, but the major gateway airports do… certainly those as important as MEL and SYD.
-RooFlyer88