offshore171
Established Member
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2014
- Posts
- 1,301
I think it's more of a Western society thing in general
>France and Germany have entered the chat
I think it's more of a Western society thing in general
American.....thongs
I like itThat has not stopped people wearing JimJams in a Lounge or out in public for that matter
One could also say the same about activewear.
This is still jarring:
View attachment 324591
they can wear their version of thong(s) all they like. I just don't want to see it (well perhaps on selected individuals.. hey I'm only human )I cannot wait to see an American trying to defy Qantas’ dress code policy and wear their thongs to the lounge …..
and I personally wouldn't give two hoots if anyone did (i'm not making any body shaming affirmation comments about anyone ).This fat old lady still wants to wear her crocs
I think you mean thong! I don’t know about you but I think most folks would find it challenging to fit into multiple thongsI cannot wait to see an American trying to defy Qantas’ dress code policy and wear their thongs to the lounge …..
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
One on each hoofI think you mean thong! I don’t know about you but I think most folks would find it challenging to fit into multiple thongs
For some reason, the supposed enlightened still don't understand the "don't judge a book by its cover"we make decisions based on people’s appearances.
Don't judge a book by its cover is precisely how my dad got kicked off the annual book cover judging panel. Easily some of the worst advice I've heard!For some reason, the supposed enlightened still don't understand the "don't judge a book by its cover"
Unfortunately sometimes all you have is the cover to make judgement.For some reason, the supposed enlightened still don't understand the "don't judge a book by its cover"
So you don't like someone with tank top and hairy armpits, even if they just sit there and do nothing? Geez...I have been thinking about different attitudes.
I do care about the way some people dress and I don't fancy sitting next to a passenger in a tank top with hairy armpits exposed.
It seems to me it's all part of a general loss of standards in the
community. Just because some may not be concerned is not a
valid reason to allow inconsiderate behaviour (read dressing ).
Unwritten and written rules, commonly known as etiquette, have
developed for the good order and peaceful coexistence and an
understanding of others needs.
If there is one thing I'm sure of is that the relationship between behaviour and dress is often an inverse one.inconsiderate behaviour (read dressing ).
I have been thinking about different attitudes.
I do care about the way some people dress and I don't fancy sitting next to a passenger in a tank top with hairy armpits exposed.
It seems to me it's all part of a general loss of standards in the
community. Just because some may not be concerned is not a
valid reason to allow inconsiderate behaviour (read dressing ).
Unwritten and written rules, commonly known as etiquette, have
developed for the good order and peaceful coexistence and an
understanding of others needs.
As long as you don’t mind her tank top and hairy armpits.How would you feel if I said I did not want to sit next to a woman with her hair uncovered? Or even to sit in the same room as a woman? Should her inconsiderate behaviour (read dressing) be allowed?