Neither have I, however, I've taken a slightly different approach because I have an existing correspondence trail and ongoing case reference with them, so rather than call and be read the script by some uninterested automaton call centre worker who just wants to get through her required quota number of calls for the day as quickly as possible so she can get home and watch F-Boy Island, I've written to them and fed their own words back to them in writing to ask why I've not been included.
It probably won't work though, because I believe the waiver offer has been allocated out entirely randomly. I don't believe any science or thought or algorithms have had any role at all in deciding which customers get the waiver and which don't. They've just used a simple blanket numbers approach. We need Y number of customers to maintain a viable credit business. On current projections based on cancellation rates to date, we believe we are going to end up with X customers when the dust settles. We therefore need to convince Y-X of the existing customers to not cancel in order to maintain a viable credit business, noting of course that it is always much harder to attract a new customer than to retain an existing one.
That Y-X number has then been decided on by something like those who have an odd account number vs those with an even one. Something as ridiculous as that. There is no pattern or logic to it at all, which would actually be perfectly consistent with all Latitude Finance business decisions to date frankly, so it shouldn't be a surprise at all.