However the Malaysian government told the Chinese relatives that there was evidence that could not be released including the transcript of ATC conversations with MH370.
The previous transcript in the press was from China.Apparently the recording was translated into Mandarin then retranslated to English.The Malaysian Government has decided to release the transcript to the Chinese relatives hence it now comes out with the true words.I think the most you can say is the Malaysians were backed into a corner by the press.From the other sites I read I believe it is normal to keep such transcripts sealed for the investigating team but I am only taking the word of others for that.
Either way, it doesn't seem like there's a significant change which arises from this error. So no point making a storm in a teacup, especially when a plane still needs to be found.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Its actually a significant change that would be recognized by anybody familiar with Aviation comms, its gone from very unusual phraseology to routine and almost correct.
I'm not familiar with aviation comms, although having listened to a little bit of radio I can agree with that.
No one really raised questions as to why it sounded so unusually phrased the first time? Or did we all just believe prima facie that the transcription was correct? Of course, we - the public - had no idea of the source, so we just took for granted whoever told us, usually our local news team.
So it seems the final words from MH370 have been changed by the Malaysians overnight from "all right, good night" to "good night Malaysian three seven zero".
A lot more formal than the previously declared sign off which had such a focus on it, believing it to be a sign of someone under duress.
How can the Malaysians keep getting this so wrong? What information has actually been a fact to date I wonder?
I just do not see the torture for these families ending any time soon.
Earlier in this thread, I think I wrote perhaps they (whomever was flying) were seeking to come to Australia. It would be awfully tragic if that were the case. Perhaps they thought they had enough fuel to make it to Perth?
If they thought hijacking a plane would get them into Australia, they would be utter morons. That is the most unlikely scenario of any I've heard so far.
If they thought hijacking a plane would get them into Australia, they would be utter morons. That is the most unlikely scenario of any I've heard so far.
Earlier in this thread, I think I wrote perhaps they (whomever was flying) were seeking to come to Australia. It would be awfully tragic if that were the case. Perhaps they thought they had enough fuel to make it to Perth?
Without finding the plane, we'll never know the answers to a lot of questions.
Well, it might be unlikely in this case. But the hijackers of Ethiopian Airlines asked the pilots to go to Australia...until they crashed in the ocean!
Ethiopian Airlines Flight 961 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Why wouldn't you just do as what the Ethiopian plane did going to Geneva a month ago? There shouldnt have been any issues making PER with the fuel that they had on board. From memory the flight is 5 hours 40 minutes scheduled, so I don't think fuel would have been an issue.
And whoever was controlling those aspects, along with "going dark" knew enough about the operation of a 777 to know how to calculate and monitor the fuel required to get to somewhere in Australia.But with all that changing of direction, increased altitude etc...