MH 777 missing - MH370 media statement

Status
Not open for further replies.
Turn back seen on radar,flying to way points and the satellite pings which indicate the plane was in the air for ~8 hours.
Fire,calamitous decompression just don't fit with that evidence.About the only thing that does is that it is the deliberate act of someone.
No other scenario is as likely.

A non-calamitous decompression still possibly fits on all but the way point course alterations. Is it possible an autopilot may make those alterations whilst trying to make sense of the original flight path and current bearings? Electronics can be confused at times.

Is it possible that both pilots were sucked out due to a broken coughpit windscreen? Do pilots always wear belts/harnesses and only release them one at a time? Could pax/crew attempt the heading changes without the pilots?
 
Here's another conspiracy theory. I haven't closely examined it for holes, but I think it's got a few!

http://sofrep.com/34084/alright-goodnight-malaysia-want-know-happened-flight-mh-370/

First time I've heard this theory:

Other information that was skimmed over. Did a US Navy Submarine hear the plane impact the water off the Andaman Islands? On March 13th, Martha Raddatz, Senior Foreign Affairs Correspondent for ABC News filed a story about the comms systems being shut down separately with this statement: “U.S. officials said earlier that they have an “indication” the missing Malaysian Airlines jetliner may have crashed in the Indian Ocean and is moving the USS Kidd to the area to begin searching.” I believe this is one of the most credible pieces of information about the disappearance of this airliner to come from any source.

Read more: http://sofrep.com/34084/alright-goodnight-malaysia-want-know-happened-flight-mh-370/#ixzz2xffkcibQ

Wonder if they'll ever find it ...
 
A non-calamitous decompression still possibly fits on all but the way point course alterations. Is it possible an autopilot may make those alterations whilst trying to make sense of the original flight path and current bearings? Electronics can be confused at times.

Is it possible that both pilots were sucked out due to a broken coughpit windscreen? Do pilots always wear belts/harnesses and only release them one at a time? Could pax/crew attempt the heading changes without the pilots?

So many questions! If only we had a real item of evidence apart from the radar track and the "ping". I just find it so hard to reconcile a catastrophic failure that takes out electronics/comms, and yet allows the plane to fly a very precise track until it reached the Indian Ocean.
 
I just find it so hard to reconcile a catastrophic failure that takes out electronics/comms,

Perhaps the failure did not take out electronics/comms............just the two people who knew how to use it? (yes I know it's not likely).
 
What are the chances of ditching an aircraft in the middle of the ocean and being successful in keeping it in one piece?

Even if it did the depth of the Indian Ocean where it is thought it ditched would mean the plane would reach a depth where it would be crushed by the water pressure so the hull would not stay intact so smaller items would escape and almost certainly get to the surface.Those however woulod be next to impossible to retrieve let alone being seen.
but with the waves of the southern Indian ocean it is very likely to have broken up on impact.it is not the Hudson river.
 
Even if it did the depth of the Indian Ocean where it is thought it ditched would mean the plane would reach a depth where it would be crushed by the water pressure so the hull would not stay intact so smaller items would escape and almost certainly get to the surface.Those however woulod be next to impossible to retrieve let alone being seen.
but with the waves of the southern Indian ocean it is very likely to have broken up on impact.it is not the Hudson river.

I guess the point remains the same. For the sake of the families involved I do hope that there is some good news in finding the wreckage soon.
 
Here is another opinion but by a fellow involved in the Silk Air and the Egyptair crashes both thought to be pilot suicides.He was a lead investigator for the NTSB.

“I don’t believe the information that’s available right now, as I know it and has been publicized, will be enough to come up with a single cause or probable cause,” he said in an interview March 31.
Feith believes there will be several plausible theories that all will point to a deliberate act by someone with intimate knowledge of flying the Boeing 777, most likely one of the pilots. Too many deliberate actions maneuvering the airplane and turning off communications systems occurred to have any plausible mechanical failure explanation. He completely discounts theories that a fire, either in the electronics bay or involving lithium-ion batteries being transported in a cargo bay, disabled the airplane. He also discounts a theory that there was a depressurization that incapacitated the pilots and allowed the 777 to meander over the skies of the Gulf of Thailand, Malaysia and the Strait of Malacca before turning south 3,000 miles over the Indian Ocean before running out of fuel.
“When you look at the way the systems shut down just prior to the last communications—the transponder, then ACARS…” and the fact that ACARS had “pinging” communication with satellites after the transmission of data stopped, tells this veteran investigator that human intervention was responsible

He goes on to discount fire,depressurisation and hijacking.
MH370 wreckage, probable cause may never be found, says ex-NTSB investigator | Leeham News and Comment
 
All we need now is a well placed negative story from the secret girlfriend of Capt Shah and this baby is ready to be wrapped up with a nice bow.
 
Do non-US airlines carry air marshals?

I've no idea, hence the question? Since 9/11 I thought many airlines were carrying some kind of covert security detachment. At least it was a comforting, albeit possibly incorrect, thought!
 
Do non-US airlines carry air marshals?

I've no idea, hence the question? Since 9/11 I thought many airlines were carrying some kind of covert security detachment. At least it was a comforting, albeit possibly incorrect, thought!

I flew RJ FRA-AMM-CDG about three years back and they have a security guard sitting in the jump seat protecting next to the coughpit. I was sitting in the J cabin and they are clearly visible and all they do is what normal security guards do. It would be extremely boring I'd say.
 
I flew RJ FRA-AMM-CDG about three years back and they have a security guard sitting in the jump seat protecting next to the coughpit. I was sitting in the J cabin and they are clearly visible and all they do is what normal security guards do. It would be extremely boring I'd say.

Isn't the "jump seat" usually inside the coughpit, hence you wouldn't see them, otherwise they'd be leaving the door open, asking you to give it a shot...?
 
Turn business expenses into Business Class! Process $10,000 through pay.com.au to score 20,000 bonus PayRewards Points and join 30k+ savvy business owners enjoying these benefits:

- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Here is another opinion but by a fellow involved in the Silk Air and the Egyptair crashes both thought to be pilot suicides.He was a lead investigator for the NTSB. He goes on to discount fire,depressurisation and hijacking.
MH370 wreckage, probable cause may never be found, says ex-NTSB investigator | Leeham News and Comment
I'd believe anything Greg Feith said. He was great on ACI and is so well respected. He brings a lot of experience to the debate.

I just hope he's wrong about finding the hull.
 
Isn't the "jump seat" usually inside the coughpit, hence you wouldn't see them, otherwise they'd be leaving the door open, asking you to give it a shot...?

No.4 sectors on RJ.On the AMM-IST-AMM legs 1 in 1A.
On the BKK-AMM-BKK legs 2 in 1A,C.
 
Just got this email from Enrich...I'm sure they went through many drafts before sending this email:

Dear defurax,

My name is Khairul Nisa and I have recently joined the Enrich Team. I am honoured to join a solid group united in offering the best to Enrich members.

The last several weeks have been an extremely challenging time for Malaysia Airlines. We are deeply saddened with the disappearance of MH370 and the 239 souls on board. Our thoughts and prayers go out to their families and loved ones.

As we reflect on this testing time, we are deeply touched by the kind and encouraging words from Enrich members and the general public alike. We are truly appreciative of your support.

Your continued membership and patronage is our pride; your encouragement is the best motivation for us to serve you better.

From the team at Enrich, Thank You.

Yours sincerely,

Vice President, Loyalty
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top