- Joined
- Jan 29, 2012
- Posts
- 15,550
- Qantas
- LT Gold
- Virgin
- Red
Considering the same person is in the background of both, I suspect they both are.I have been told that the MH one is a fake one.
Considering the same person is in the background of both, I suspect they both are.I have been told that the MH one is a fake one.
Article doesn't give much detail but I'd think a few problems with it
- doesnt appear to intersect with 7th arc
- plane would have to be flying much slower than normal cruise
- flying that close to Indonesia and Australia you would surely hit some Indonesian radar or Australias long range radar.
Uh huh. The plane flew low and slow so the pilots could parachute out of the coughpit. Then the autopilot took the plane back up to 30,000 feet, killing all the passengers, and then flew toll it crashed.
At the very least the problem seems to be a motive.
Like with EVERY other major disaster in recent history, things are never quite what they appear. My bet is that the truth is so unbelievable that 99.99% of the population wouldn't be able to accept it as fact.
Yet another theory: Sinister new MH370 crash theory
Geoffrey Thomas has an Airline Ratings website article debunking the Dane's views.
All very technical, but Mr Thomas quotes an 'unnamed expert.' It would be far better if the person concerned put his or her name to the comments. It may be unfair, but whenever I read media articles quoting 'sources' (especially prevalent in political stories), my first thought is often 'are these the reporter's views cleverly disguised?'
...Journalistic integrity would prevent any good journalist from attempting to disguise their own views under such a banner....
Given the history of the stories author, I wouldn't be surprised to find the "unnamed expert" was Geoffrey Thomas.Geoffrey Thomas has an Airline Ratings website article debunking the Dane's views.
All very technical, but Mr Thomas quotes an 'unnamed expert.' It would be far better if the person concerned put his or her name to the comments. It may be unfair, but whenever I read media articles quoting 'sources' (especially prevalent in political stories), my first thought is often 'are these the reporter's views cleverly disguised?'
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements