DrA
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2010
- Posts
- 527
Option D? There was no DG on board as freight. It was carrying ...a working flux capacitor.
To be honest, I think this is the best explanation yet
Option D? There was no DG on board as freight. It was carrying ...a working flux capacitor.
I am tired of the theories related to the flight simulator setup the captain had. Flight sim software has thousands of airports on it, so finding five in the vicinity of the area of interest means absolutely jack even if they were extra detailed payware ones that he had to buy as an add on. Initial reports suggested extreme suspicion was raised because the sim setup had three monitors ... I mean come on, it's just sensationalist rubbish.
Let's discount the pilot owning a detailed sim software setup as a reason he may be the culprit. There may be more on the computer than the sim software that could point fingers in his direction but the software itself proves nothing other than enthusiasm for aviation.
I think it was more than just simulator software. I think it was some form of actual simulator, with wrap-around screens, a panel of instruments, pedals etc. (But not I expect the hydraulics that tilt the 'cabin' up, down & around )
Shown in a video here
No idea of relevance in the grand scheme of things - but it wasn't just a laptop running software.
Who cares about the simulator really. Do mechanics not fiddle with cars on the weekend? It people play with home networks, etc etc.
We'll not likely know how it fits in unless they find the aircraft or electronic records in the simulator mimicking the events, but even that could indicate he loves B-grade movies.
And now more radar data, this time from the Thais: Malaysia Airlines missing jet: Thailand gives radar data 10 days after plane lost
Like the argument that no one specifically asked them for it!!!
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
They are building a 4th Antartic base, I bet it's related to that, mind you the data is fuzzy, never seen a cargo ship do 49 knots!
The water was taken from our hotel fridge just before check out.
They are building a 4th Antartic base, I bet it's related to that, mind you the data is fuzzy, never seen a cargo ship do 49 knots!
The voice of reason? But where is it?
Is this the most plausible theory on missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370? | News.com.au
Oh shame on me for quoting No-News twice in a day!
But there are too many unanswered questions in this theory, much as I admire its Occam's Razor-like simplicity.
My question is: Is it possible to have a tire burst on take off without leaving any debris on the runway?
Also, if it were fire, is it possible for the airframe to hold up for that long (i.e as long as the aircraft was sending out pings)?
When I arrived into NKG on night 11th there is no APEC channel